SAUG vs. SMYY
SAUG (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August) and SMYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SAUG charges 0.90%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for SMYY.
Performance
SAUG vs. SMYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAUG achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly higher than SMYY's -7.06% return.
SAUG
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 6.69%
- YTD
- 9.68%
- 1Y
- 20.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.14%
SMYY
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -3.18%
- 6M
- -8.64%
- YTD
- -7.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $113.37K | $112.92K | $119.82K | |
| $174.24K | $172.34K | $252.90K |
SAUG vs. SMYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SAUG FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August | 9.68% | 2.00% |
SMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF | -7.06% | -27.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAUG and SMYY is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAUG vs. SMYY — Risk / Return Rank
SAUG
SMYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SAUG vs. SMYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August (SAUG) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF (SMYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SAUG | SMYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.99 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.97 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SAUG vs. SMYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAUG drawdown since its inception was -14.62%, smaller than the maximum SMYY drawdown of -38.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAUG and SMYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAUG | SMYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.62% | -38.26% | +23.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -37.93% | +37.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.12% | -26.93% | +24.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.08% | — | — |
Volatility
SAUG vs. SMYY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAUG | SMYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.41% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.08% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.60% | 30.69% | -22.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.49% | 30.69% | -19.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.49% | 30.69% | -19.20% |
SAUG vs. SMYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAUG has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than SMYY's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
SAUG vs. SMYY - Dividend Comparison
SAUG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 215.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
SAUG FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF | 215.38% | 53.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SAUG and SMYY have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SAUG is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SAUG is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for SMYY.
SMYY has the higher dividend yield at 215.38%, compared with 0.00% for SAUG.
They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SAUG and 1.07% for SMYY.
Find the right allocation for SAUG and SMYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer