SATO vs. XMMO
SATO (Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SATO is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index, while XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SATO returned 20.64%/yr vs 26.07%/yr for XMMO. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SATO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMMO.
Performance
SATO vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SATO achieves a -11.75% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 14.98% return.
SATO
- 1D
- -3.36%
- 1M
- -10.88%
- 6M
- -23.63%
- YTD
- -11.75%
- 1Y
- -22.30%
- 3Y*
- 20.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMMO
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- -6.35%
- 6M
- 12.33%
- YTD
- 14.98%
- 1Y
- 23.50%
- 3Y*
- 26.07%
- 5Y*
- 14.78%
- 10Y*
- 18.67%
SATO vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF | -11.75% | 2.26% | 55.25% | 266.77% | -80.20% | -17.33% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 14.98% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -16.02% | 7.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between SATO and XMMO is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2021 | 0.55 |
The correlation between SATO and XMMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SATO vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank
SATO
XMMO
SATO vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SATO | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.21 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | 2.71 | -3.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | 9.57 | -10.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SATO vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SATO drawdown since its inception was -88.00%, which is greater than XMMO's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SATO and XMMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SATO | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.00% | -55.37% | -32.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.49% | -8.71% | -44.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.49% | -24.93% | -28.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.92% | -8.71% | -37.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.75% | -9.42% | -41.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.01% | 2.46% | +29.55% |
Volatility
SATO vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) has a higher volatility of 12.67% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) at 8.09%. This indicates that SATO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SATO | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.67% | 8.09% | +4.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.10% | 17.47% | +20.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.01% | 20.67% | +31.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.99% | 21.76% | +41.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.99% | 22.34% | +40.65% |
SATO vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SATO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SATO vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison
SATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.60%, more than XMMO's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF | 7.60% | 9.50% | 15.03% | 2.21% | 8.97% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.61% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SATO and XMMO have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SATO has higher volatility (12.67%) compared to XMMO (8.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SATO dropped -88.00% vs XMMO's -55.37%.
On 3-year performance, XMMO leads with 26.07% vs 20.64% for SATO. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XMMO has been the lower-risk option at 8.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 26.07% return vs 20.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SATO.
SATO has the higher dividend yield at 7.60%, compared with 0.61% for XMMO.
SATO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while XMMO is Momentum. SATO tracks Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SATO and 0.35% for XMMO.
XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SATO and XMMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer