PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SATO vs. FTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SATO vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SATO achieves a 3.47% return, which is significantly lower than FTEC's 31.89% return.


SATO

1D
-2.77%
1M
0.47%
YTD
3.47%
6M
-11.57%
1Y
10.13%
3Y*
45.60%
5Y*
10Y*

FTEC

1D
-1.49%
1M
18.21%
YTD
31.89%
6M
30.74%
1Y
60.87%
3Y*
33.93%
5Y*
22.49%
10Y*
25.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SATO vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SATO
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF
3.47%2.26%55.25%266.77%-80.20%-17.39%
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
31.89%22.11%29.40%53.30%-29.59%12.01%

Correlation

The correlation between SATO and FTEC is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2021

0.63

The correlation between SATO and FTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

SATO vs. FTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SATO
FTEC

Financial Services

57.1%
0.6%

Technology

32.2%
98.0%

Consumer Cyclical

4.4%
0.0%

Communication Services

3.0%
0.0%

Industrials

1.9%
0.6%

Utilities

1.5%

-

Healthcare

1.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

SATO
57.1%
FTEC
0.6%

Technology

SATO
32.2%
FTEC
98.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SATO
4.4%
FTEC
0.0%

Communication Services

SATO
3.0%
FTEC
0.0%

Industrials

SATO
1.9%
FTEC
0.6%

Utilities

SATO
1.5%
FTEC

-

Healthcare

SATO
1.2%
FTEC

-

Basic Materials

SATO

-

FTEC

-

Consumer Defensive

SATO

-

FTEC

-

Energy

SATO

-

FTEC
0.4%

Real Estate

SATO

-

FTEC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SATO vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SATO
SATO Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SATO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SATO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
SATO Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
SATO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
SATO Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

FTEC
FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SATO vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SATOFTECDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.20

2.97

-2.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.65

3.65

-3.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.48

-0.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.19

3.76

-3.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.35

12.10

-11.75

SATO vs. FTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SATO Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the FTEC Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SATO and FTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SATOFTECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

2.97

-2.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

0.99

-0.99

Drawdowns

SATO vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SATO drawdown since its inception was -88.00%, which is greater than FTEC's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SATO and FTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SATOFTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.00%

-34.95%

-53.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.49%

-16.26%

-37.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.49%

-27.30%

-26.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.60%

-1.49%

-35.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.00%

-5.56%

-45.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.16%

5.05%

+24.11%

Volatility

SATO vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) has a higher volatility of 11.64% compared to Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) at 6.43%. This indicates that SATO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SATOFTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.64%

6.43%

+5.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.36%

16.14%

+22.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.53%

20.63%

+30.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.28%

25.23%

+38.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.28%

24.69%

+38.59%

SATO vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SATO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

SATO vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison

SATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.62%, more than FTEC's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
0.32%0.43%0.49%0.77%0.93%0.63%0.83%1.03%1.20%0.96%1.25%1.27%
SATO
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF
7.62%9.50%15.03%2.21%8.97%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SATO and FTEC have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SATO has higher volatility (11.64%) compared to FTEC (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SATO dropped -88.00% vs FTEC's -34.95%.

On 3-year performance, SATO leads with 45.60% vs 33.93% for FTEC. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FTEC has been the lower-risk option at 6.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SATO has performed better with a 45.60% return vs 33.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SATO.

SATO has the higher dividend yield at 7.62%, compared with 0.32% for FTEC.

SATO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while FTEC is Technology Equities. SATO tracks Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index, while FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SATO and 0.08% for FTEC.

FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SATO and FTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer