SATO vs. CBXO
SATO (Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF) and CBXO (Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - SATO is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index, while CBXO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. SATO is passively managed, while CBXO is actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SATO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBXO.
Performance
SATO vs. CBXO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SATO achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly higher than CBXO's -3.74% return.
SATO
- 1D
- -2.97%
- 1M
- -5.75%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 6M
- -5.06%
- 1Y
- 8.50%
- 3Y*
- 37.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBXO
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- YTD
- -3.74%
- 6M
- -4.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SATO vs. CBXO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF | 0.09% | -38.72% |
CBXO Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | -3.74% | -8.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between SATO and CBXO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SATO vs. CBXO — Risk / Return Rank
SATO
CBXO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SATO vs. CBXO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) and Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBXO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SATO | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.28 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SATO vs. CBXO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SATO drawdown since its inception was -88.00%, which is greater than CBXO's maximum drawdown of -11.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SATO and CBXO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SATO | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.00% | -11.51% | -76.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.67% | -11.49% | -27.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.82% | -8.66% | -42.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.44% | — | — |
Volatility
SATO vs. CBXO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SATO | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.50% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.64% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.11% | 6.94% | +45.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.17% | 6.94% | +56.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.17% | 6.94% | +56.23% |
SATO vs. CBXO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SATO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CBXO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
SATO vs. CBXO - Dividend Comparison
SATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, more than CBXO's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBXO Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.53% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF | 6.70% | 9.50% | 15.03% | 2.21% | 8.97% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SATO and CBXO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SATO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SATO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBXO.
SATO has the higher dividend yield at 6.70%, compared with 0.53% for CBXO.
SATO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBXO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SATO and 0.69% for CBXO.
Find the right allocation for SATO and CBXO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer