SATO vs. BITC
SATO (Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF) and BITC (Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. SATO is passively managed, while BITC is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SATO returned 46.97%/yr vs 36.02%/yr for BITC. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SATO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for BITC.
Performance
SATO vs. BITC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SATO achieves a 6.41% return, which is significantly lower than BITC's 6.98% return.
SATO
- 1D
- -2.72%
- 1M
- 5.43%
- YTD
- 6.41%
- 6M
- -5.78%
- 1Y
- 16.97%
- 3Y*
- 46.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITC
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -2.30%
- YTD
- 6.98%
- 6M
- -1.16%
- 1Y
- -15.15%
- 3Y*
- 36.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SATO vs. BITC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF | 6.41% | 2.26% | 55.25% | 120.13% |
BITC Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF | 6.98% | -20.46% | 97.86% | 42.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between SATO and BITC is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2023 | 0.65 |
The correlation between SATO and BITC shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SATO vs. BITC — Risk / Return Rank
SATO
BITC
SATO vs. BITC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) and Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SATO | BITC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.33 | -0.60 | +0.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.83 | -0.72 | +1.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.89 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | -0.58 | +0.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.65 | -0.83 | +1.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SATO | BITC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | -0.60 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.68 | -0.67 |
Drawdowns
SATO vs. BITC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SATO drawdown since its inception was -88.00%, which is greater than BITC's maximum drawdown of -38.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SATO and BITC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SATO | BITC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.00% | -38.51% | -49.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.49% | -26.51% | -26.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.49% | -38.51% | -14.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.80% | -26.48% | -8.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.02% | -16.36% | -34.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.07% | 18.32% | +10.75% |
Volatility
SATO vs. BITC - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) has a higher volatility of 11.41% compared to Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) at 6.79%. This indicates that SATO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SATO | BITC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.41% | 6.79% | +4.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.64% | 19.98% | +18.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.47% | 25.54% | +25.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.29% | 46.68% | +16.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.29% | 46.68% | +16.61% |
SATO vs. BITC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SATO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BITC's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
SATO vs. BITC - Dividend Comparison
SATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, more than BITC's 3.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITC Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF | 3.14% | 3.36% | 42.68% | 5.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF | 7.41% | 9.50% | 15.03% | 2.21% | 8.97% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SATO and BITC have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SATO has higher volatility (11.41%) compared to BITC (6.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SATO dropped -88.00% vs BITC's -38.51%.
On 3-year performance, SATO leads with 46.97% vs 36.02% for BITC. On fees, SATO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, BITC has been the lower-risk option at 6.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SATO has performed better with a 46.97% return vs 36.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SATO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for BITC.
SATO has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 3.14% for BITC.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SATO and 0.88% for BITC.
SATO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.33 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SATO and BITC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer