SATO vs. BFOC
SATO (Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF) and BFOC (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - SATO is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index, while BFOC is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust. SATO is passively managed, while BFOC is actively managed. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SATO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFOC.
Performance
SATO vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SATO achieves a -13.37% return, which is significantly lower than BFOC's -7.46% return.
SATO
- 1D
- -3.22%
- 1M
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -16.14%
- YTD
- -13.37%
- 1Y
- -18.39%
- 3Y*
- 21.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -3.90%
BFOC
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- 6M
- -6.08%
- YTD
- -7.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $37.88K | $50.79K | $63.29K | |
| $33.71K | $38.05K | $74.17K |
SATO vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF | -13.37% | -28.98% |
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | -7.46% | -9.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between SATO and BFOC is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SATO vs. BFOC — Risk / Return Rank
SATO
BFOC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SATO vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SATO | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.67 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SATO vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SATO drawdown since its inception was -88.00%, which is greater than BFOC's maximum drawdown of -18.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SATO and BFOC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SATO | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.00% | -18.41% | -69.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.92% | -18.26% | -28.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.68% | -13.50% | -37.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.62% | — | — |
Volatility
SATO vs. BFOC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SATO | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.55% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.43% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.26% | 11.68% | +41.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.98% | 11.68% | +51.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.98% | 11.68% | +51.30% |
SATO vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SATO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BFOC's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
SATO vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison
SATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.74%, while BFOC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF | 7.74% | 9.50% | 15.03% | 2.21% | 8.97% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SATO and BFOC have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SATO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SATO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFOC.
SATO has the higher dividend yield at 7.74%, compared with 0.00% for BFOC.
SATO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFOC is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SATO and 0.90% for BFOC.
Find the right allocation for SATO and BFOC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer