SARK vs. KOMP
SARK (Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF) and KOMP (SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SARK is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AXS, while KOMP is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index. SARK is actively managed, while KOMP is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SARK returned -30.74%/yr vs 21.79%/yr for KOMP. At a correlation of -0.86, they often move in opposite directions. SARK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for KOMP.
Performance
SARK vs. KOMP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SARK achieves a -6.78% return, which is significantly lower than KOMP's 23.59% return.
SARK
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- -6.78%
- 6M
- -2.33%
- 1Y
- -33.81%
- 3Y*
- -30.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KOMP
- 1D
- -2.06%
- 1M
- 11.27%
- YTD
- 23.59%
- 6M
- 21.48%
- 1Y
- 46.75%
- 3Y*
- 21.79%
- 5Y*
- 3.36%
- 10Y*
- —
SARK vs. KOMP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | -6.78% | -25.93% | -36.90% | -46.32% | 83.35% | 20.78% |
KOMP SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF | 23.59% | 19.74% | 10.05% | 20.09% | -32.21% | -12.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between SARK and KOMP is -0.82, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021 | -0.86 |
The correlation between SARK and KOMP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.86 to -0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SARK vs. KOMP — Risk / Return Rank
SARK
KOMP
SARK vs. KOMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) and SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SARK | KOMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.33 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 3.03 | -3.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.11 | 9.86 | -10.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SARK | KOMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.95 | 2.03 | -2.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.24 | 0.52 | -0.76 |
Drawdowns
SARK vs. KOMP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SARK drawdown since its inception was -81.07%, which is greater than KOMP's maximum drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SARK and KOMP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SARK | KOMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.07% | -50.06% | -31.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.75% | -15.50% | -25.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.42% | -24.93% | -49.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.42% | -2.06% | -77.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.46% | -21.69% | -24.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.47% | 4.75% | +25.72% |
Volatility
SARK vs. KOMP - Volatility Comparison
Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) has a higher volatility of 9.13% compared to SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) at 7.43%. This indicates that SARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KOMP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SARK | KOMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.13% | 7.43% | +1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.05% | 17.95% | +7.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.91% | 23.15% | +12.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.24% | 24.78% | +31.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.24% | 27.02% | +29.22% |
SARK vs. KOMP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SARK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than KOMP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
SARK vs. KOMP - Dividend Comparison
SARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, more than KOMP's 1.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KOMP SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF | 1.43% | 1.84% | 1.04% | 1.27% | 1.47% | 1.44% | 0.69% | 0.81% | 0.13% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 3.02% | 2.82% | 15.49% | 12.57% | 25.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SARK and KOMP have a correlation of -0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SARK has higher volatility (9.13%) compared to KOMP (7.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SARK dropped -81.07% vs KOMP's -50.06%.
On 3-year performance, KOMP leads with 21.79% vs -30.74% for SARK. On fees, KOMP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, KOMP has been the lower-risk option at 7.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, KOMP has performed better with a 21.79% return vs -30.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KOMP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SARK.
SARK has the higher dividend yield at 3.02%, compared with 1.43% for KOMP.
SARK is categorized as Inverse Equities, while KOMP is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: AXS and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SARK and 0.20% for KOMP.
KOMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SARK and KOMP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer