SARK vs. CRCD
SARK (Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF) and CRCD (T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SARK charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for CRCD.
Performance
SARK vs. CRCD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SARK achieves a -7.36% return, which is significantly higher than CRCD's -83.41% return.
SARK
- 1D
- -4.39%
- 1M
- 4.63%
- 6M
- -11.06%
- YTD
- -7.36%
- 1Y
- -14.81%
- 3Y*
- -28.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -12.60%
CRCD
- 1D
- -10.59%
- 1M
- -12.17%
- 6M
- -90.37%
- YTD
- -83.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.39M | $8.05M | $15.13M | |
| $5.02M | $4.74M | $6.36M |
SARK vs. CRCD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | -7.36% | 2.41% |
CRCD T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF | -83.41% | 38.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between SARK and CRCD is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SARK vs. CRCD — Risk / Return Rank
SARK
CRCD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SARK vs. CRCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) and T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SARK | CRCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SARK vs. CRCD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SARK drawdown since its inception was -81.07%, smaller than the maximum CRCD drawdown of -96.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SARK and CRCD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SARK | CRCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.07% | -96.95% | +15.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.55% | -92.13% | +12.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.59% | -61.94% | +14.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.77% | — | — |
Volatility
SARK vs. CRCD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SARK | CRCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.78% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.06% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.50% | 198.47% | -161.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.76% | 198.47% | -142.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.76% | 198.47% | -142.71% |
SARK vs. CRCD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SARK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CRCD's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SARK vs. CRCD - Dividend Comparison
SARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, while CRCD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRCD T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 3.04% | 2.82% | 15.49% | 12.57% | 25.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SARK and CRCD have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SARK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SARK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRCD.
SARK has the higher dividend yield at 3.04%, compared with 0.00% for CRCD.
They also come from different issuers: AXS and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SARK and 1.50% for CRCD.
Find the right allocation for SARK and CRCD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer