SAPH vs. TRUO
SAPH (ADRhedged SAP ETF) and TRUO (VanEck Consumer Staples TruSector ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SAPH is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by ADRhedged, while TRUO is a Consumer Staples Equities fund actively managed by VanEck. Both are actively managed. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SAPH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for TRUO.
Performance
SAPH vs. TRUO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SAPH
- 1D
- 3.32%
- 1M
- 19.22%
- 6M
- -15.81%
- YTD
- -19.27%
- 1Y
- -32.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -20.71%
TRUO
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 3.40%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $30.61K | $28.06K | $22.54K | |
| $21.17K | $12.74K | $16.61K |
SAPH vs. TRUO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SAPH ADRhedged SAP ETF | -0.57% |
TRUO VanEck Consumer Staples TruSector ETF | 5.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAPH and TRUO is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAPH vs. TRUO — Risk / Return Rank
SAPH
TRUO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SAPH vs. TRUO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ADRhedged SAP ETF (SAPH) and VanEck Consumer Staples TruSector ETF (TRUO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SAPH | TRUO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.11 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SAPH vs. TRUO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAPH drawdown since its inception was -51.72%, which is greater than TRUO's maximum drawdown of -3.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAPH and TRUO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAPH | TRUO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.72% | -3.45% | -48.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.47% | 0.00% | -39.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.11% | -1.45% | -21.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.05% | — | — |
Volatility
SAPH vs. TRUO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAPH | TRUO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.67% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.36% | 19.21% | +18.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.48% | 19.21% | +16.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.48% | 19.21% | +16.27% |
SAPH vs. TRUO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAPH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUO's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SAPH vs. TRUO - Dividend Comparison
SAPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, while TRUO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
SAPH ADRhedged SAP ETF | 3.46% |
TRUO VanEck Consumer Staples TruSector ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SAPH and TRUO have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUO is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUO is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for SAPH.
SAPH has the higher dividend yield at 3.46%, compared with 0.00% for TRUO.
SAPH is categorized as Actively Managed, while TRUO is Consumer Staples Equities. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SAPH and 0.14% for TRUO.
Find the right allocation for SAPH and TRUO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer