SAN.PA vs. UL
SAN.PA (Sanofi) and UL (The Unilever Group) are both stocks. SAN.PA operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare), while UL operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, SAN.PA returned 5.46%/yr vs 4.99%/yr for UL. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SAN.PA vs. UL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SAN.PA is traded in EUR, while UL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the UL values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAN.PA achieves a -2.23% return, which is significantly higher than UL's -6.94% return. Over the past 10 years, SAN.PA has outperformed UL with an annualized return of 5.46%, while UL has yielded a comparatively lower 4.99% annualized return.
SAN.PA
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 5.32%
- YTD
- -2.23%
- 6M
- -2.94%
- 1Y
- -7.76%
- 3Y*
- -2.17%
- 5Y*
- 1.20%
- 10Y*
- 5.46%
UL
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 4.76%
- YTD
- -6.94%
- 6M
- -6.34%
- 1Y
- -14.78%
- 3Y*
- 2.64%
- 5Y*
- 1.58%
- 10Y*
- 4.99%
SAN.PA vs. UL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAN.PA Sanofi | -2.23% | -7.87% | 8.77% | 3.64% | 4.92% | 16.86% | -8.97% | 23.41% | 10.36% | -3.49% |
UL The Unilever Group | -6.94% | -6.61% | 28.88% | -3.16% | 3.21% | -0.70% | 0.05% | 15.43% | 2.25% | 22.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAN.PA and UL is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2007 | 0.35 |
The correlation between SAN.PA and UL shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (3 years) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAN.PA vs. UL — Risk / Return Rank
SAN.PA
UL
SAN.PA vs. UL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sanofi (SAN.PA) and The Unilever Group (UL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SAN.PA | UL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.89 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | -0.62 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | -1.25 | +0.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SAN.PA vs. UL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAN.PA drawdown since its inception was -43.30%, smaller than the maximum UL drawdown of -48.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAN.PA and UL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAN.PA | UL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.30% | -48.75% | +5.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.18% | -23.88% | +7.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.80% | -24.85% | -2.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.80% | -24.85% | -2.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.35% | -30.27% | -0.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.98% | -19.26% | -3.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.52% | -9.25% | -4.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.92% | 11.91% | -2.99% |
Volatility
SAN.PA vs. UL - Volatility Comparison
Sanofi (SAN.PA) and The Unilever Group (UL) have volatilities of 6.61% and 6.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAN.PA | UL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.61% | 6.50% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.36% | 16.50% | -1.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.04% | 20.92% | +3.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.77% | 19.85% | +2.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.35% | 21.25% | +0.10% |
Dividends
SAN.PA vs. UL - Dividend Comparison
SAN.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.38%, more than UL's 3.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAN.PA Sanofi | 5.38% | 4.74% | 4.01% | 3.97% | 3.71% | 3.61% | 4.00% | 3.43% | 4.00% | 4.12% | 3.81% | 3.63% |
UL The Unilever Group | 3.87% | 3.51% | 3.29% | 3.83% | 3.57% | 3.77% | 3.07% | 3.18% | 3.49% | 2.80% | 3.42% | 3.02% |
Financials
SAN.PA vs. UL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sanofi and The Unilever Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SAN.PA and UL have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SAN.PA and UL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer