PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAMT vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAMT vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAMT achieves a 20.25% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 11.20% return.


SAMT

1D
-0.66%
1M
6.66%
YTD
20.25%
6M
23.92%
1Y
42.07%
3Y*
28.84%
5Y*
10Y*

VTI

1D
-0.72%
1M
4.99%
YTD
11.20%
6M
11.09%
1Y
28.18%
3Y*
22.07%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAMT vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SAMT
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
20.25%33.10%28.15%1.27%-6.59%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
11.20%17.10%23.81%26.05%-11.37%

Correlation

The correlation between SAMT and VTI is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2022

0.79

The correlation between SAMT and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

SAMT vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SAMT
VTI

Technology

27.8%
33.5%

Industrials

22.0%
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

12.0%
4.7%

Communication Services

7.8%
10.3%

Utilities

6.6%
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%
10.0%

Financial Services

5.6%
12.0%

Healthcare

4.3%
9.2%

Energy

2.9%
3.7%

Real Estate

2.9%
2.4%

Basic Materials

2.7%
2.0%

Technology

SAMT
27.8%
VTI
33.5%

Industrials

SAMT
22.0%
VTI
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

SAMT
12.0%
VTI
4.7%

Communication Services

SAMT
7.8%
VTI
10.3%

Utilities

SAMT
6.6%
VTI
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SAMT
5.6%
VTI
10.0%

Financial Services

SAMT
5.6%
VTI
12.0%

Healthcare

SAMT
4.3%
VTI
9.2%

Energy

SAMT
2.9%
VTI
3.7%

Real Estate

SAMT
2.9%
VTI
2.4%

Basic Materials

SAMT
2.7%
VTI
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAMT vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAMT
SAMT Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SAMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAMT Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SAMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAMT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAMT vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SAMTVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.42

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.19

3.17

+2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.30

14.62

-0.32

SAMT vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAMT Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAMT and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SAMTVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

2.33

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.51

+0.47

Drawdowns

SAMT vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAMT drawdown since its inception was -20.57%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAMT and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAMTVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.57%

-55.45%

+34.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.15%

-8.92%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.27%

-19.30%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-0.72%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.72%

-8.03%

+0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

1.93%

+1.02%

Volatility

SAMT vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT) has a higher volatility of 6.82% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 2.96%. This indicates that SAMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAMTVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.82%

2.96%

+3.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.56%

9.13%

+3.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.68%

12.17%

+4.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.94%

17.40%

-0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

18.30%

-1.36%

SAMT vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAMT has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

SAMT vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

SAMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than VTI's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SAMT
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
0.58%0.70%1.40%1.49%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


SAMT and VTI have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SAMT has higher volatility (6.82%) compared to VTI (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAMT dropped -20.57% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 3-year performance, SAMT leads with 28.84% vs 22.07% for VTI. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SAMT has performed better with a 28.84% return vs 22.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for SAMT.

VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.58% for SAMT.

They also come from different issuers: Strategas and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for SAMT and 0.03% for VTI.

SAMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAMT and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer