PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SAMT vs. BDGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SAMT and BDGS is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

SAMT vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
15.85%
8.94%
SAMT
BDGS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SAMT:

1.93

BDGS:

3.96

Sortino Ratio

SAMT:

2.60

BDGS:

7.01

Omega Ratio

SAMT:

1.36

BDGS:

2.22

Calmar Ratio

SAMT:

3.16

BDGS:

8.67

Martin Ratio

SAMT:

13.38

BDGS:

37.97

Ulcer Index

SAMT:

2.16%

BDGS:

0.55%

Daily Std Dev

SAMT:

14.96%

BDGS:

5.25%

Max Drawdown

SAMT:

-20.57%

BDGS:

-5.38%

Current Drawdown

SAMT:

-6.33%

BDGS:

-0.14%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAMT achieves a 6.36% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 2.57% return.


SAMT

YTD

6.36%

1M

-1.16%

6M

15.85%

1Y

27.86%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BDGS

YTD

2.57%

1M

0.06%

6M

8.94%

1Y

20.47%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SAMT vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAMT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.


BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
Expense ratio chart for BDGS: current value at 0.85% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.85%
Expense ratio chart for SAMT: current value at 0.65% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.65%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SAMT vs. BDGS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAMT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SAMT is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SAMT is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SAMT is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SAMT is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SAMT is 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SAMT is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

BDGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BDGS is 9898
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SAMT vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SAMT, currently valued at 1.93, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.933.96
The chart of Sortino ratio for SAMT, currently valued at 2.60, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.607.01
The chart of Omega ratio for SAMT, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.362.22
The chart of Calmar ratio for SAMT, currently valued at 4.19, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.198.67
The chart of Martin ratio for SAMT, currently valued at 13.38, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0013.3837.97
SAMT
BDGS

The current SAMT Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is lower than the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 3.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAMT and BDGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.93
3.96
SAMT
BDGS

Dividends

SAMT vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

SAMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than BDGS's 1.77% yield.


TTM202420232022
SAMT
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
1.32%1.40%1.50%0.73%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
1.77%1.81%0.84%0.00%

Drawdowns

SAMT vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAMT drawdown since its inception was -20.57%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAMT and BDGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-6.33%
-0.14%
SAMT
BDGS

Volatility

SAMT vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT) has a higher volatility of 7.43% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 0.62%. This indicates that SAMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
7.43%
0.62%
SAMT
BDGS
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab