PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAMT vs. HCMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SAMT vs. HCMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT) and Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (HCMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SAMT vs. HCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SAMT
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
1.97%33.10%28.15%1.49%
HCMT
Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF
-8.58%7.39%39.14%5.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAMT achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly higher than HCMT's -8.58% return.


SAMT

1D
2.00%
1M
-1.60%
YTD
1.97%
6M
6.10%
1Y
35.45%
3Y*
22.13%
5Y*
10Y*

HCMT

1D
-0.03%
1M
-6.60%
YTD
-8.58%
6M
-5.95%
1Y
17.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SAMT vs. HCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAMT has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than HCMT's 1.17% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SAMT vs. HCMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAMT
SAMT Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SAMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAMT Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SAMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAMT Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

HCMT
HCMT Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
HCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
HCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAMT vs. HCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT) and Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (HCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SAMTHCMTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.01

0.58

+1.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.65

0.91

+1.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.13

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.10

0.89

+3.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.61

2.48

+9.13

SAMT vs. HCMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAMT Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the HCMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAMT and HCMT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SAMTHCMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

0.58

+1.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.49

+0.27

Correlation

The correlation between SAMT and HCMT is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SAMT vs. HCMT - Dividend Comparison

SAMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, more than HCMT's 0.46% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
SAMT
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
0.69%0.70%1.40%1.49%0.73%
HCMT
Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF
0.46%0.43%2.75%0.63%0.00%

Drawdowns

SAMT vs. HCMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAMT drawdown since its inception was -20.57%, smaller than the maximum HCMT drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAMT and HCMT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SAMTHCMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.57%

-36.26%

+15.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.76%

-19.31%

+10.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.78%

-13.50%

+7.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.00%

-8.33%

+0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

6.93%

-3.83%

Volatility

SAMT vs. HCMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT) is 4.97%, while Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (HCMT) has a volatility of 7.70%. This indicates that SAMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HCMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SAMTHCMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.97%

7.70%

-2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.91%

20.08%

-8.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.68%

29.73%

-12.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.78%

29.03%

-12.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.78%

29.03%

-12.25%