PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAMT vs. ARKW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAMT vs. ARKW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT) and ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAMT achieves a 12.63% return, which is significantly higher than ARKW's -7.37% return.


SAMT

1D
0.47%
1M
-5.73%
6M
8.34%
YTD
12.63%
1Y
24.28%
3Y*
23.90%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.23%

ARKW

1D
-1.02%
1M
-5.74%
6M
-0.05%
YTD
-7.37%
1Y
-7.47%
3Y*
27.92%
5Y*
-1.16%
10Y*
21.15%
ALL TIME*
19.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.60M$12.21M$13.95M
$5.05M$5.51M$7.81M

SAMT vs. ARKW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SAMT
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
12.63%33.10%28.15%1.27%-6.30%
ARKW
ARK Next Generation Internet ETF
-7.37%38.93%42.27%96.89%-58.49%

Correlation

The correlation between SAMT and ARKW is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2022

0.60

The correlation between SAMT and ARKW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

SAMT vs. ARKW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SAMT
ARKW

Industrials

21.8%
3.5%

Technology

20.4%
49.7%

Consumer Defensive

15.4%

-

Healthcare

10.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
16.8%

Communication Services

6.0%
15.3%

Financial Services

4.8%
14.7%

Basic Materials

4.2%

-

Utilities

4.2%

-

Real Estate

2.4%

-

Energy

2.0%

-

Industrials

SAMT
21.8%
ARKW
3.5%

Technology

SAMT
20.4%
ARKW
49.7%

Consumer Defensive

SAMT
15.4%
ARKW

-

Healthcare

SAMT
10.4%
ARKW

-

Consumer Cyclical

SAMT
8.4%
ARKW
16.8%

Communication Services

SAMT
6.0%
ARKW
15.3%

Financial Services

SAMT
4.8%
ARKW
14.7%

Basic Materials

SAMT
4.2%
ARKW

-

Utilities

SAMT
4.2%
ARKW

-

Real Estate

SAMT
2.4%
ARKW

-

Energy

SAMT
2.0%
ARKW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAMT vs. ARKW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SAMT
SAMT Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SAMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAMT Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SAMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAMT Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

ARKW
ARKW Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
ARKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKW Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKW Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SAMT vs. ARKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT) and ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SAMTARKWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

0.97

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

-0.33

+2.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.04

-0.62

+6.66

SAMT vs. ARKW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAMT Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is higher than the ARKW Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAMT and ARKW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SAMT vs. ARKW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAMT drawdown since its inception was -20.57%, smaller than the maximum ARKW drawdown of -80.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAMT and ARKW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAMTARKWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.57%

-80.52%

+59.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.79%

-36.21%

+26.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.27%

-36.21%

+17.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.13%

-25.76%

+16.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.62%

-23.95%

+16.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.78%

19.34%

-15.56%

Volatility

SAMT vs. ARKW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT) is 3.43%, while ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) has a volatility of 8.84%. This indicates that SAMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAMTARKWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

8.84%

-5.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.23%

25.86%

-11.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.72%

33.57%

-15.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.11%

43.76%

-26.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.11%

37.82%

-20.71%

SAMT vs. ARKW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAMT has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKW's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

SAMT vs. ARKW - Dividend Comparison

SAMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than ARKW's 1.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARKW
ARK Next Generation Internet ETF
1.72%1.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%1.29%0.00%13.05%2.05%0.00%2.29%
SAMT
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
0.62%0.70%1.40%1.49%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SAMT and ARKW have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARKW has higher volatility (8.84%) compared to SAMT (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAMT dropped -20.57% vs ARKW's -80.52%.

On 3-year performance, ARKW leads with 27.92% vs 23.90% for SAMT. On fees, SAMT is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, SAMT has been the lower-risk option at 3.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ARKW has performed better with a 27.92% return vs 23.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SAMT is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ARKW.

ARKW has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 0.62% for SAMT.

SAMT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ARKW is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Strategas and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for SAMT and 0.76% for ARKW.

SAMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAMT and ARKW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer