SAMM vs. PTH
SAMM (Strategas Macro Momentum ETF) and PTH (Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds. SAMM is actively managed, while PTH is passively managed. Over the past year, SAMM returned 14.49% vs 60.76% for PTH. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SAMM charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PTH.
Performance
SAMM vs. PTH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAMM achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly lower than PTH's 19.81% return.
SAMM
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -5.03%
- 6M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 1Y
- 14.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PTH
- 1D
- 2.28%
- 1M
- 12.80%
- 6M
- 21.36%
- YTD
- 19.81%
- 1Y
- 60.76%
- 3Y*
- 15.33%
- 5Y*
- 2.68%
- 10Y*
- 14.84%
SAMM vs. PTH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SAMM Strategas Macro Momentum ETF | 2.70% | 12.01% | 8.32% |
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF | 19.81% | 27.91% | -6.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAMM and PTH is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2024 | 0.60 |
The correlation between SAMM and PTH shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SAMM vs. PTH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SAMM
PTH
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
SAMM
PTH
-
Technology
SAMM
PTH
-
Basic Materials
SAMM
PTH
-
Healthcare
SAMM
PTH
Consumer Cyclical
SAMM
PTH
-
Financial Services
SAMM
PTH
Energy
SAMM
PTH
-
Utilities
SAMM
PTH
-
Communication Services
SAMM
PTH
-
Consumer Defensive
SAMM
PTH
-
Real Estate
SAMM
-
PTH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAMM vs. PTH — Risk / Return Rank
SAMM
PTH
SAMM vs. PTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategas Macro Momentum ETF (SAMM) and Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SAMM | PTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.40 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 5.10 | -3.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.64 | 12.85 | -8.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SAMM vs. PTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAMM drawdown since its inception was -24.09%, smaller than the maximum PTH drawdown of -53.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAMM and PTH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAMM | PTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.09% | -53.52% | +29.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.19% | -11.98% | +2.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -50.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.19% | -3.44% | -5.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.45% | -16.94% | +12.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 4.75% | -1.62% |
Volatility
SAMM vs. PTH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Strategas Macro Momentum ETF (SAMM) is 6.15%, while Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) has a volatility of 7.48%. This indicates that SAMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAMM | PTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.15% | 7.48% | -1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.27% | 19.41% | -4.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.06% | 24.42% | -5.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.38% | 25.69% | -6.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.38% | 27.34% | -7.96% |
SAMM vs. PTH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAMM has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than PTH's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SAMM vs. PTH - Dividend Comparison
SAMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than PTH's 2.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF | 2.56% | 3.07% | 0.06% |
SAMM Strategas Macro Momentum ETF | 1.01% | 1.03% | 0.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SAMM and PTH have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTH has higher volatility (7.48%) compared to SAMM (6.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAMM dropped -24.09% vs PTH's -53.52%.
On 1-year performance, PTH leads with 60.76% vs 14.49% for SAMM. On fees, PTH is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SAMM has been the lower-risk option at 6.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PTH has performed better with a 60.76% return vs 14.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PTH is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for SAMM.
PTH has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 1.01% for SAMM.
They also come from different issuers: Strategas and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for SAMM and 0.60% for PTH.
PTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SAMM and PTH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer