PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SABIX vs. SIBPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SABIX vs. SIBPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saratoga Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SABIX) and Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio (SIBPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SABIX vs. SIBPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SABIX
Saratoga Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio
-3.06%13.01%12.49%15.20%-11.36%14.93%9.53%18.72%-8.74%
SIBPX
Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio
-0.73%6.50%0.78%2.90%-2.51%-1.73%3.34%3.84%-0.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SABIX achieves a -3.06% return, which is significantly lower than SIBPX's -0.73% return.


SABIX

1D
2.35%
1M
-5.09%
YTD
-3.06%
6M
-1.49%
1Y
12.33%
3Y*
11.25%
5Y*
6.26%
10Y*

SIBPX

1D
0.32%
1M
-1.55%
YTD
-0.73%
6M
-0.38%
1Y
2.98%
3Y*
2.75%
5Y*
1.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SABIX vs. SIBPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SABIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than SIBPX's 1.54% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SABIX vs. SIBPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SABIX
SABIX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SABIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SABIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SABIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SABIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
SABIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

SIBPX
SIBPX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
SIBPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIBPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIBPX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
SIBPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIBPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SABIX vs. SIBPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SABIX) and Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio (SIBPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SABIXSIBPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.94

0.77

+0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.41

1.13

+0.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.13

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

1.23

+0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.39

3.88

+1.51

SABIX vs. SIBPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SABIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is comparable to the SIBPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SABIX and SIBPX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SABIXSIBPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

0.77

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.33

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.47

+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between SABIX and SIBPX is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SABIX vs. SIBPX - Dividend Comparison

SABIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.14%, more than SIBPX's 1.99% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SABIX
Saratoga Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio
10.14%9.83%3.12%2.81%7.12%9.63%1.82%3.72%3.06%0.00%
SIBPX
Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio
1.99%2.24%2.31%1.54%0.14%1.39%0.58%0.99%1.21%1.03%

Drawdowns

SABIX vs. SIBPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SABIX drawdown since its inception was -29.06%, which is greater than SIBPX's maximum drawdown of -5.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SABIX and SIBPX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SABIXSIBPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.06%

-5.57%

-23.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.99%

-2.78%

-6.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.20%

-4.93%

-12.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.70%

-2.06%

-3.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.20%

-1.70%

-2.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

0.88%

+1.23%

Volatility

SABIX vs. SIBPX - Volatility Comparison

Saratoga Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SABIX) has a higher volatility of 4.83% compared to Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio (SIBPX) at 1.60%. This indicates that SABIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIBPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SABIXSIBPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

1.60%

+3.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.14%

2.62%

+5.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.64%

4.30%

+9.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.40%

3.29%

+9.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.37%

2.73%

+11.64%