PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAIC vs. MSFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SAIC vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAIC achieves a 19.45% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -20.72% return. Over the past 10 years, SAIC has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 8.52%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 22.49% annualized return.


SAIC

1D
2.14%
1M
11.95%
6M
8.81%
YTD
19.45%
1Y
5.12%
3Y*
1.52%
5Y*
7.69%
10Y*
8.52%
ALL TIME*
12.80%

MSFT

1D
0.03%
1M
8.18%
6M
-17.72%
YTD
-20.72%
1Y
-25.10%
3Y*
3.64%
5Y*
6.55%
10Y*
22.49%
ALL TIME*
24.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.81B$16.07B$15.66B
$49.96M$54.61M$59.26M

SAIC vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SAIC
Science Applications International Corporation
19.45%-8.73%-9.04%13.58%34.95%-10.20%10.81%39.15%-15.48%-8.18%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-20.72%15.58%12.93%58.19%-28.02%52.48%42.53%57.56%20.80%40.73%

Correlation

The correlation between SAIC and MSFT is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2013

0.30

The correlation between SAIC and MSFT shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (3 years) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SAIC:

$5.03B

MSFT:

$2.84T

EPS

SAIC:

$8.85

MSFT:

$16.79

PE Ratio

SAIC:

13.45

MSFT:

22.73

PEG Ratio

SAIC:

0.82

MSFT:

1.59

PS Ratio

SAIC:

0.75

MSFT:

8.94

PB Ratio

SAIC:

3.68

MSFT:

6.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

SAIC:

$7.29B

MSFT:

$318.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SAIC:

$912.00M

MSFT:

$217.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

SAIC:

$691.00M

MSFT:

$200.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAIC vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAIC
SAIC Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SAIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAIC Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SAIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAIC Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAIC vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SAICMSFTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

0.86

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.16

-0.72

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.29

-1.30

+1.59

SAIC vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAIC Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is higher than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAIC and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SAIC vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAIC drawdown since its inception was -45.92%, smaller than the maximum MSFT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAIC and MSFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAICMSFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.92%

-69.38%

+23.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.34%

-34.50%

+3.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.74%

-34.50%

-11.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.74%

-37.15%

-8.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.92%

-37.15%

-8.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.91%

-29.14%

+8.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.72%

-21.80%

+9.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.10%

19.07%

-1.97%

Volatility

SAIC vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) has a higher volatility of 10.65% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 9.82%. This indicates that SAIC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAICMSFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.65%

9.82%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.83%

24.50%

+6.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.72%

27.61%

+12.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.41%

27.08%

+3.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.68%

27.16%

+5.52%

Dividends

SAIC vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

SAIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than MSFT's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.93%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%
SAIC
Science Applications International Corporation
1.24%1.47%1.32%1.19%1.33%1.77%1.56%1.63%1.95%1.62%1.46%2.58%

Financials

SAIC vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Science Applications International Corporation and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

SAIC vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Science Applications International Corporation and Microsoft Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

Portfolio components
SAIC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Science Applications International Corporation reported a gross profit of 249.00M and revenue of 1.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.1%.

MSFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 56.06B and revenue of 82.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

SAIC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Science Applications International Corporation reported an operating income of 179.00M and revenue of 1.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.

MSFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.40B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.

SAIC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Science Applications International Corporation reported a net income of 115.00M and revenue of 1.91B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.

MSFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 31.78B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SAIC and MSFT have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SAIC has higher volatility (10.65%) compared to MSFT (9.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAIC dropped -45.92% vs MSFT's -69.38%.

SAIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.13 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAIC and MSFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer