SAH vs. R
SAH (Sonic Automotive, Inc.) and R (Ryder System, Inc.) are both stocks. SAH operates in Auto & Truck Dealerships (Consumer Cyclical), while R operates in Rental & Leasing Services (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, SAH returned 19.73%/yr vs 20.28%/yr for R. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SAH vs. R - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAH achieves a 35.20% return, which is significantly lower than R's 41.14% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SAH having a 19.73% annualized return and R not far ahead at 20.28%.
SAH
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- 5.62%
- YTD
- 35.20%
- 6M
- 30.01%
- 1Y
- 4.85%
- 3Y*
- 23.41%
- 5Y*
- 14.91%
- 10Y*
- 19.73%
R
- 1D
- 2.65%
- 1M
- 7.72%
- YTD
- 41.14%
- 6M
- 36.59%
- 1Y
- 75.11%
- 3Y*
- 50.95%
- 5Y*
- 32.14%
- 10Y*
- 20.28%
SAH vs. R - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAH Sonic Automotive, Inc. | 35.20% | -0.27% | 15.18% | 16.72% | 1.93% | 29.41% | 26.06% | 129.24% | -24.45% | -18.62% |
R Ryder System, Inc. | 41.14% | 24.53% | 39.51% | 41.61% | 4.38% | 37.59% | 20.15% | 17.42% | -41.03% | 15.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAH and R is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 1997 | 0.42 |
Fundamentals
SAH:
$2.81B
R:
$10.61B
SAH:
$3.17
R:
$12.04
SAH:
26.13
R:
22.25
SAH:
3.61
R:
1.52
SAH:
0.19
R:
0.87
SAH:
2.87
R:
3.71
SAH:
$15.19B
R:
$12.66B
SAH:
$2.25B
R:
$3.29B
SAH:
$517.70M
R:
$2.65B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAH vs. R — Risk / Return Rank
SAH
R
SAH vs. R - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sonic Automotive, Inc. (SAH) and Ryder System, Inc. (R). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SAH | R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.39 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.14 | 4.31 | -4.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.23 | 11.77 | -11.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SAH vs. R - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAH drawdown since its inception was -97.17%, which is greater than R's maximum drawdown of -74.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAH and R.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAH | R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.17% | -74.02% | -23.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.64% | -17.52% | -16.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.64% | -23.86% | -9.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.97% | -29.97% | -8.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.80% | -72.26% | +1.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.77% | -4.43% | -0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.03% | -22.49% | -11.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.23% | 6.40% | +14.83% |
Volatility
SAH vs. R - Volatility Comparison
Sonic Automotive, Inc. (SAH) has a higher volatility of 11.52% compared to Ryder System, Inc. (R) at 7.71%. This indicates that SAH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than R based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAH | R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.52% | 7.71% | +3.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.46% | 25.22% | +1.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.07% | 33.78% | +6.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.05% | 33.03% | +9.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.54% | 36.59% | +10.95% |
Dividends
SAH vs. R - Dividend Comparison
SAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than R's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R Ryder System, Inc. | 1.36% | 1.80% | 1.94% | 2.31% | 2.87% | 2.77% | 3.63% | 4.05% | 4.40% | 2.14% | 2.28% | 2.75% |
SAH Sonic Automotive, Inc. | 1.87% | 2.36% | 1.97% | 2.06% | 2.09% | 0.93% | 1.04% | 1.29% | 1.74% | 1.08% | 0.87% | 0.49% |
Financials
SAH vs. R - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sonic Automotive, Inc. and Ryder System, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SAH vs. R - Profitability Comparison
SAH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sonic Automotive, Inc. reported a gross profit of 560.10M and revenue of 3.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.2%.
R - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ryder System, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.36B and revenue of 3.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.6%.
SAH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sonic Automotive, Inc. reported an operating income of 133.10M and revenue of 3.69B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.6%.
R - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ryder System, Inc. reported an operating income of 93.00M and revenue of 3.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.0%.
SAH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sonic Automotive, Inc. reported a net income of 60.80M and revenue of 3.69B, resulting in a net margin of 1.7%.
R - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ryder System, Inc. reported a net income of 93.00M and revenue of 3.13B, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SAH and R have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SAH has higher volatility (11.52%) compared to R (7.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAH dropped -97.17% vs R's -74.02%.
R currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SAH and R
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer