PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAGPX vs. FAMRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAGPX vs. FAMRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Strategic Asset Management Conservative Growth Portfolio (SAGPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAGPX achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly lower than FAMRX's 13.08% return. Over the past 10 years, SAGPX has underperformed FAMRX with an annualized return of 10.92%, while FAMRX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.68% annualized return.


SAGPX

1D
0.24%
1M
-0.33%
6M
8.82%
YTD
9.44%
1Y
17.11%
3Y*
18.13%
5Y*
9.20%
10Y*
10.92%

FAMRX

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.52%
6M
12.19%
YTD
13.08%
1Y
24.09%
3Y*
17.86%
5Y*
9.21%
10Y*
11.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAGPX vs. FAMRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SAGPX
Principal Strategic Asset Management Conservative Growth Portfolio
9.44%15.24%21.99%18.93%-18.09%17.13%12.53%23.55%-7.12%19.33%
FAMRX
Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund
13.08%20.87%12.60%18.98%-18.55%17.10%19.37%26.26%-9.21%21.08%

Correlation

The correlation between SAGPX and FAMRX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 1999

0.90

The correlation between SAGPX and FAMRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAGPX vs. FAMRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAGPX
SAGPX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SAGPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAGPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAGPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SAGPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAGPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

FAMRX
FAMRX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FAMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FAMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAGPX vs. FAMRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Strategic Asset Management Conservative Growth Portfolio (SAGPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SAGPXFAMRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.35

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

2.66

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.96

11.44

-1.48

SAGPX vs. FAMRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAGPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the FAMRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAGPX and FAMRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SAGPX vs. FAMRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAGPX drawdown since its inception was -49.37%, smaller than the maximum FAMRX drawdown of -58.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAGPX and FAMRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAGPXFAMRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.37%

-58.65%

+9.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.92%

-9.33%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.68%

-15.35%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.89%

-26.00%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.48%

-30.96%

+0.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-1.01%

+0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.61%

-12.29%

+4.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

2.16%

-0.36%

Volatility

SAGPX vs. FAMRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Strategic Asset Management Conservative Growth Portfolio (SAGPX) is 4.29%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that SAGPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAMRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAGPXFAMRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

5.82%

-1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.01%

11.23%

-2.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.74%

13.28%

-2.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.76%

14.83%

-1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.71%

15.26%

-1.55%

SAGPX vs. FAMRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAGPX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FAMRX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

SAGPX vs. FAMRX - Dividend Comparison

SAGPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.29%, more than FAMRX's 4.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAMRX
Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund
4.92%5.56%3.44%1.33%5.07%3.15%1.99%5.52%5.62%2.31%0.28%4.83%
SAGPX
Principal Strategic Asset Management Conservative Growth Portfolio
12.29%13.45%13.19%1.22%11.82%8.20%3.37%3.93%14.06%8.42%3.33%11.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, SAGPX and FAMRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FAMRX has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to SAGPX (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAGPX dropped -49.37% vs FAMRX's -58.65%.

FAMRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAGPX and FAMRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer