SAGPX vs. ONEQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SAGPX (Principal Strategic Asset Management Conservative Growth Portfolio) and ONEQ (Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF) are both funds - SAGPX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by BlackRock, while ONEQ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite Index. Over the past 10 years, SAGPX returned 10.94%/yr vs 19.68%/yr for ONEQ. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SAGPX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for ONEQ.

Performance

SAGPX vs. ONEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Strategic Asset Management Conservative Growth Portfolio (SAGPX) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAGPX achieves a 10.06% return, which is significantly lower than ONEQ's 16.16% return. Over the past 10 years, SAGPX has underperformed ONEQ with an annualized return of 10.94%, while ONEQ has yielded a comparatively higher 19.68% annualized return.

SAGPX

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 4.20%
• YTD: 10.06%
• 6M: 10.63%
• 1Y: 22.53%
• 3Y*: 19.52%
• 5Y*: 9.78%
• 10Y*: 10.94%

ONEQ

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 7.21%
• YTD: 16.16%
• 6M: 15.18%
• 1Y: 39.62%
• 3Y*: 27.68%
• 5Y*: 15.43%
• 10Y*: 19.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAGPX vs. ONEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SAGPX Principal Strategic Asset Management Conservative Growth Portfolio	10.06%	15.24%	21.99%	18.93%	-18.09%	17.13%	12.53%	23.55%	-7.12%	19.33%
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF	16.16%	20.89%	29.30%	45.73%	-32.12%	22.11%	44.87%	38.01%	-3.18%	29.29%

Correlation

The correlation between SAGPX and ONEQ is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2003	0.89

The correlation between SAGPX and ONEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SAGPX vs. ONEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAGPX

SAGPX Risk / Return Rank: 61
SAGPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
SAGPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
SAGPX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
SAGPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
SAGPX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

ONEQ

ONEQ Risk / Return Rank: 68
ONEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
ONEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
ONEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 69
ONEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
ONEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAGPX vs. ONEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Strategic Asset Management Conservative Growth Portfolio (SAGPX) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SAGPX	ONEQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	2.48	-0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.21	3.26	-0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.43	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.91	3.15	-0.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.14	12.46	+0.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SAGPX vs. ONEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAGPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the ONEQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAGPX and ONEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SAGPX	ONEQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28	2.48	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	0.70	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80	0.91	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.65	-0.14

Drawdowns

SAGPX vs. ONEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAGPX drawdown since its inception was -49.37%, smaller than the maximum ONEQ drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAGPX and ONEQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SAGPX	ONEQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.37%	-55.09%	+5.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.92%	-12.64%	+4.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.68%	-24.09%	+10.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.89%	-35.23%	+10.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.48%	-35.23%	+4.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.85%	+0.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.63%	-7.95%	+0.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.75%	3.19%	-1.44%

Volatility

SAGPX vs. ONEQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Strategic Asset Management Conservative Growth Portfolio (SAGPX) is 3.03%, while Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) has a volatility of 4.20%. This indicates that SAGPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SAGPX	ONEQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.03%	4.20%	-1.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.19%	11.96%	-3.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.13%	16.05%	-5.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.66%	22.14%	-8.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.76%	21.71%	-7.95%

SAGPX vs. ONEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAGPX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ONEQ's 0.21% expense ratio.

Dividends

SAGPX vs. ONEQ - Dividend Comparison

SAGPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.22%, more than ONEQ's 0.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF	0.67%	0.54%	0.65%	0.71%	0.97%	0.54%	0.71%	2.51%	1.08%	0.84%	1.12%	1.04%
SAGPX Principal Strategic Asset Management Conservative Growth Portfolio	12.22%	13.45%	13.19%	1.22%	11.82%	8.20%	3.37%	3.93%	14.06%	8.42%	3.33%	11.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SAGPX and ONEQ in my portfolio?

SAGPX and ONEQ have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SAGPX or ONEQ?

ONEQ has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to SAGPX (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAGPX dropped -49.37% vs ONEQ's -55.09%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ONEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.