SAEU.L vs. CMU.L
SAEU.L (iShares MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and CMU.L (Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select) are both Europe Equities funds - SAEU.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while CMU.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SAEU.L returned 9.78%/yr vs 10.52%/yr for CMU.L. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SAEU.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CMU.L.
Performance
SAEU.L vs. CMU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SAEU.L is traded in GBP, while CMU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CMU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAEU.L achieves a 6.49% return, which is significantly lower than CMU.L's 15.89% return.
SAEU.L
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- YTD
- 6.49%
- 6M
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- 18.84%
- 3Y*
- 13.90%
- 5Y*
- 9.78%
- 10Y*
- —
CMU.L
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 8.13%
- YTD
- 15.89%
- 6M
- 17.12%
- 1Y
- 29.56%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- 10.79%
SAEU.L vs. CMU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAEU.L iShares MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 6.49% | 24.54% | 4.11% | 15.10% | -5.84% | 16.79% | 4.11% | 19.61% | -2.56% |
CMU.L Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select | 15.89% | 25.71% | 1.42% | 14.39% | -5.30% | 13.03% | 4.59% | 19.05% | -3.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAEU.L and CMU.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018 | 0.91 |
The correlation between SAEU.L and CMU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
SAEU.L vs. CMU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SAEU.L
CMU.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
SAEU.L
CMU.L
Industrials
SAEU.L
CMU.L
Healthcare
SAEU.L
CMU.L
Technology
SAEU.L
CMU.L
Consumer Cyclical
SAEU.L
CMU.L
Utilities
SAEU.L
CMU.L
Basic Materials
SAEU.L
CMU.L
Consumer Defensive
SAEU.L
CMU.L
Communication Services
SAEU.L
CMU.L
Energy
SAEU.L
CMU.L
Real Estate
SAEU.L
CMU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAEU.L vs. CMU.L — Risk / Return Rank
SAEU.L
CMU.L
SAEU.L vs. CMU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAEU.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SAEU.L | CMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.37 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 2.58 | -0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.04 | 9.67 | -3.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SAEU.L | CMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 1.98 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.66 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.49 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
SAEU.L vs. CMU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAEU.L drawdown since its inception was -28.68%, smaller than the maximum CMU.L drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAEU.L and CMU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAEU.L | CMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.68% | -32.53% | +3.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.13% | -11.43% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.84% | -11.95% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.74% | -21.11% | +3.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -0.18% | -0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.10% | -5.80% | +1.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 3.05% | +0.06% |
Volatility
SAEU.L vs. CMU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAEU.L) is 4.21%, while Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that SAEU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAEU.L | CMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 5.34% | -1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.55% | 12.44% | -1.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.57% | 14.86% | -2.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 16.00% | -1.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.74% | 16.78% | -0.04% |
SAEU.L vs. CMU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAEU.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CMU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SAEU.L vs. CMU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SAEU.L nor CMU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SAEU.L and CMU.L have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SAEU.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SAEU.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CMU.L.
SAEU.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while CMU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SAEU.L and 0.15% for CMU.L.
Find the right allocation for SAEU.L and CMU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer