SAEU.L vs. IGLN.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAEU.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L).
SAEU.L and IGLN.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SAEU.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe NR EUR. It was launched on Oct 19, 2018. IGLN.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price. It was launched on Apr 8, 2011. Both SAEU.L and IGLN.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SAEU.L vs. IGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SAEU.L vs. IGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAEU.L iShares MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 0.66% | 24.54% | 4.11% | 15.10% | -5.84% | 16.79% | 4.11% | 19.61% | -2.56% |
IGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 12.74% | 53.17% | 28.35% | 7.77% | 11.79% | -3.12% | 20.51% | 13.78% | 5.83% |
Different Trading Currencies
SAEU.L is traded in GBP, while IGLN.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IGLN.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAEU.L achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly lower than IGLN.L's 9.09% return.
SAEU.L
- 1D
- 2.39%
- 1M
- -4.37%
- YTD
- 0.66%
- 6M
- 5.62%
- 1Y
- 16.84%
- 3Y*
- 11.90%
- 5Y*
- 9.96%
- 10Y*
- —
IGLN.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -11.73%
- YTD
- 9.09%
- 6M
- 21.71%
- 1Y
- 44.08%
- 3Y*
- 29.43%
- 5Y*
- 22.64%
- 10Y*
- 14.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SAEU.L vs. IGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAEU.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IGLN.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
SAEU.L vs. IGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
SAEU.L
IGLN.L
SAEU.L vs. IGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAEU.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SAEU.L | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 1.77 | -0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.60 | 2.22 | -0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.35 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 2.56 | -1.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.02 | 10.11 | -4.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SAEU.L | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 1.77 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 1.37 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.55 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between SAEU.L and IGLN.L is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SAEU.L vs. IGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SAEU.L nor IGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SAEU.L vs. IGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAEU.L drawdown since its inception was -28.68%, smaller than the maximum IGLN.L drawdown of -41.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAEU.L and IGLN.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAEU.L | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.68% | -45.24% | +16.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.13% | -17.36% | +6.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.74% | -21.15% | +3.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.52% | -9.80% | +3.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -19.88% | +15.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 4.58% | -1.70% |
Volatility
SAEU.L vs. IGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAEU.L) is 5.97%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) has a volatility of 12.03%. This indicates that SAEU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SAEU.L | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.97% | 12.03% | -6.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.49% | 21.69% | -12.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.09% | 24.72% | -10.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.15% | 16.53% | -2.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.77% | 16.26% | +0.51% |