SAEF vs. CTEF
SAEF (Schwab Ariel ESG ETF) and CTEF (Castellan Targeted Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SAEF charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CTEF.
Performance
SAEF vs. CTEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAEF achieves a 9.41% return, which is significantly lower than CTEF's 29.35% return.
SAEF
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 2.14%
- YTD
- 9.41%
- 6M
- 11.92%
- 1Y
- 23.77%
- 3Y*
- 13.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CTEF
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 10.65%
- YTD
- 29.35%
- 6M
- 31.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SAEF vs. CTEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SAEF Schwab Ariel ESG ETF | 9.41% | 12.03% |
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF | 29.35% | 33.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAEF and CTEF is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAEF vs. CTEF — Risk / Return Rank
SAEF
CTEF
SAEF vs. CTEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Ariel ESG ETF (SAEF) and Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SAEF | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.04 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SAEF | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 3.54 | -3.33 |
Drawdowns
SAEF vs. CTEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAEF drawdown since its inception was -28.05%, which is greater than CTEF's maximum drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAEF and CTEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAEF | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.05% | -15.00% | -13.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -0.41% | -0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.39% | -1.80% | -8.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.73% | — | — |
Volatility
SAEF vs. CTEF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAEF | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.89% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.96% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.79% | 21.81% | -3.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.40% | 21.81% | -0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.40% | 21.81% | -0.41% |
SAEF vs. CTEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAEF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than CTEF's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SAEF vs. CTEF - Dividend Comparison
SAEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, more than CTEF's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF | 0.06% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SAEF Schwab Ariel ESG ETF | 0.34% | 0.38% | 0.46% | 0.46% | 0.61% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SAEF and CTEF have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CTEF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CTEF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SAEF.
SAEF has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.06% for CTEF.
They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Castellan. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SAEF and 0.45% for CTEF.
Find the right allocation for SAEF and CTEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer