PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAEF vs. CTEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAEF vs. CTEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Ariel ESG ETF (SAEF) and Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAEF achieves a 9.41% return, which is significantly lower than CTEF's 29.35% return.


SAEF

1D
-0.83%
1M
2.14%
YTD
9.41%
6M
11.92%
1Y
23.77%
3Y*
13.25%
5Y*
10Y*

CTEF

1D
-0.41%
1M
10.65%
YTD
29.35%
6M
31.78%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAEF vs. CTEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SAEF
Schwab Ariel ESG ETF
9.41%12.03%
CTEF
Castellan Targeted Equity ETF
29.35%33.22%

Correlation

The correlation between SAEF and CTEF is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025

0.66

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAEF vs. CTEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAEF
SAEF Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
SAEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAEF Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
SAEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAEF Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

CTEF
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAEF vs. CTEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Ariel ESG ETF (SAEF) and Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SAEFCTEFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.04

SAEF vs. CTEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SAEFCTEFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

3.54

-3.33

Drawdowns

SAEF vs. CTEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAEF drawdown since its inception was -28.05%, which is greater than CTEF's maximum drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAEF and CTEF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAEFCTEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.05%

-15.00%

-13.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.28%

-0.41%

-0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.39%

-1.80%

-8.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.73%

Volatility

SAEF vs. CTEF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAEFCTEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.79%

21.81%

-3.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.40%

21.81%

-0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.40%

21.81%

-0.41%

SAEF vs. CTEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAEF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than CTEF's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

SAEF vs. CTEF - Dividend Comparison

SAEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, more than CTEF's 0.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CTEF
Castellan Targeted Equity ETF
0.06%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SAEF
Schwab Ariel ESG ETF
0.34%0.38%0.46%0.46%0.61%0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


SAEF and CTEF have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CTEF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CTEF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SAEF.

SAEF has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.06% for CTEF.

They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Castellan. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SAEF and 0.45% for CTEF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAEF and CTEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer