SADA.L vs. CPJ1.L
SADA.L (Amundi Index MSCI EM Asia SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D)) and CPJ1.L (iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - SADA.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD while CPJ1.L tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SADA.L returned 14.62%/yr vs 13.41%/yr for CPJ1.L. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SADA.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CPJ1.L.
Performance
SADA.L vs. CPJ1.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SADA.L is traded in USD, while CPJ1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CPJ1.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SADA.L achieves a 17.66% return, which is significantly higher than CPJ1.L's 8.56% return.
SADA.L
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- 17.66%
- 6M
- 18.58%
- 1Y
- 40.73%
- 3Y*
- 14.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CPJ1.L
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 10.43%
- 1Y
- 16.37%
- 3Y*
- 13.41%
- 5Y*
- 4.89%
- 10Y*
- 7.74%
SADA.L vs. CPJ1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SADA.L Amundi Index MSCI EM Asia SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D) | 17.66% | 25.43% | 8.02% | -3.62% | -23.16% | -7.30% |
CPJ1.L iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc | 8.56% | 20.50% | 5.11% | 5.44% | -6.35% | -4.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between SADA.L and CPJ1.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2021 | 0.48 |
The correlation between SADA.L and CPJ1.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (3 years) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SADA.L vs. CPJ1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SADA.L
CPJ1.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
-
Technology
SADA.L
CPJ1.L
Financial Services
SADA.L
CPJ1.L
Consumer Cyclical
SADA.L
CPJ1.L
Industrials
SADA.L
CPJ1.L
Healthcare
SADA.L
CPJ1.L
Communication Services
SADA.L
CPJ1.L
Consumer Defensive
SADA.L
CPJ1.L
Basic Materials
SADA.L
CPJ1.L
Real Estate
SADA.L
CPJ1.L
Utilities
SADA.L
CPJ1.L
Energy
SADA.L
-
CPJ1.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SADA.L vs. CPJ1.L — Risk / Return Rank
SADA.L
CPJ1.L
SADA.L vs. CPJ1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI EM Asia SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D) (SADA.L) and iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SADA.L | CPJ1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.22 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.85 | 1.85 | +3.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.52 | 5.89 | +8.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SADA.L | CPJ1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.79 | 1.23 | +1.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.34 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
SADA.L vs. CPJ1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SADA.L drawdown since its inception was -38.76%, roughly equal to the maximum CPJ1.L drawdown of -38.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SADA.L and CPJ1.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SADA.L | CPJ1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.76% | -38.55% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.21% | -8.80% | -3.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.64% | -18.64% | -4.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.46% | -3.39% | +0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.67% | -8.31% | -11.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.75% | 2.77% | +3.98% |
Volatility
SADA.L vs. CPJ1.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Index MSCI EM Asia SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D) (SADA.L) has a higher volatility of 7.33% compared to iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) at 4.27%. This indicates that SADA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPJ1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SADA.L | CPJ1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.33% | 4.27% | +3.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.95% | 10.72% | +4.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.33% | 13.28% | +8.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.66% | 16.89% | +8.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.66% | 17.77% | +7.89% |
SADA.L vs. CPJ1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SADA.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CPJ1.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SADA.L vs. CPJ1.L - Dividend Comparison
SADA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, while CPJ1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPJ1.L iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SADA.L Amundi Index MSCI EM Asia SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D) | 1.34% | 1.58% | 1.54% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SADA.L and CPJ1.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CPJ1.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CPJ1.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SADA.L.
SADA.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while CPJ1.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SADA.L and 0.20% for CPJ1.L.
Find the right allocation for SADA.L and CPJ1.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer