SACAX vs. AYBLX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SACAX (Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio) and AYBLX (Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, SACAX returned 12.60%/yr vs 10.67%/yr for AYBLX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SACAX charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for AYBLX.

Performance

SACAX vs. AYBLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio (SACAX) and Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SACAX achieves a 11.18% return, which is significantly lower than AYBLX's 13.99% return. Over the past 10 years, SACAX has outperformed AYBLX with an annualized return of 12.60%, while AYBLX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.67% annualized return.

SACAX

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 1.90%
• YTD: 11.18%
• 6M: 10.53%
• 1Y: 23.82%
• 3Y*: 21.05%
• 5Y*: 10.83%
• 10Y*: 12.60%

AYBLX

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 1.64%
• YTD: 13.99%
• 6M: 13.54%
• 1Y: 32.24%
• 3Y*: 17.53%
• 5Y*: 9.58%
• 10Y*: 10.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SACAX vs. AYBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SACAX Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio	11.18%	16.56%	24.20%	21.42%	-19.06%	19.34%	15.11%	26.87%	-9.13%	21.68%
AYBLX Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund	13.99%	19.80%	9.64%	15.41%	-14.39%	15.48%	12.92%	22.22%	-4.43%	15.19%

Correlation

The correlation between SACAX and AYBLX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 1997	0.89

The correlation between SACAX and AYBLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SACAX vs. AYBLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SACAX

SACAX Risk / Return Rank: 58
SACAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
SACAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
SACAX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
SACAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
SACAX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

AYBLX

AYBLX Risk / Return Rank: 95
AYBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
AYBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
AYBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
AYBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
AYBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SACAX vs. AYBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio (SACAX) and Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SACAX	AYBLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	3.33	-1.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.81	4.68	-1.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.62	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	5.16	-2.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.38	24.00	-11.62

SACAX vs. AYBLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SACAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is lower than the AYBLX Sharpe Ratio of 3.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SACAX and AYBLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SACAX vs. AYBLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SACAX drawdown since its inception was -54.31%, which is greater than AYBLX's maximum drawdown of -36.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SACAX and AYBLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SACAX	AYBLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.31%	-36.28%	-18.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.85%	-6.41%	-2.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.88%	-13.39%	-2.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.96%	-20.26%	-6.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.90%	-24.24%	-10.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.46%	-0.52%	+0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.77%	-3.78%	-5.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	1.38%	+0.63%

Volatility

SACAX vs. AYBLX - Volatility Comparison

Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio (SACAX) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX) at 3.63%. This indicates that SACAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AYBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SACAX	AYBLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.65%	3.63%	+1.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.10%	7.83%	+2.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.25%	9.95%	+2.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.72%	11.13%	+4.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.09%	11.33%	+4.76%

SACAX vs. AYBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SACAX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than AYBLX's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

SACAX vs. AYBLX - Dividend Comparison

SACAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.79%, more than AYBLX's 3.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AYBLX Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund	3.24%	3.58%	2.59%	1.76%	3.23%	8.61%	4.12%	6.03%	9.97%	9.42%	2.63%	4.14%
SACAX Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio	10.79%	11.99%	13.37%	1.16%	9.30%	7.53%	4.02%	4.47%	20.79%	6.82%	3.68%	14.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SACAX and AYBLX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, SACAX and AYBLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SACAX or AYBLX?

SACAX has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to AYBLX (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SACAX dropped -54.31% vs AYBLX's -36.28%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AYBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.