SAA vs. BENJ

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

SAA (ProShares Ultra SmallCap600) and BENJ (Horizon Landmark ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SAA is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Index (200%), while BENJ is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Horizon. SAA is passively managed, while BENJ is actively managed. Over the past year, SAA returned 65.99% vs 3.80% for BENJ. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. SAA charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BENJ.

Performance

SAA vs. BENJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) and Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAA achieves a 39.76% return, which is significantly higher than BENJ's 1.67% return.

SAA

• 1D: 2.12%
• 1M: 10.49%
• YTD: 39.76%
• 6M: 33.10%
• 1Y: 65.99%
• 3Y*: 22.52%
• 5Y*: 2.84%
• 10Y*: 12.84%

BENJ

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 1.67%
• 6M: 1.75%
• 1Y: 3.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAA vs. BENJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SAA ProShares Ultra SmallCap600	39.76%	-5.47%
BENJ Horizon Landmark ETF	1.67%	3.72%

Correlation

The correlation between SAA and BENJ is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025	-0.01

Return for Risk

SAA vs. BENJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAA

SAA Risk / Return Rank: 66
SAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
SAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
SAA Omega Ratio Rank: 54
SAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
SAA Martin Ratio Rank: 72

BENJ

BENJ Risk / Return Rank: 98
BENJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
BENJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BENJ Omega Ratio Rank: 99
BENJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
BENJ Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAA vs. BENJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) and Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SAA	BENJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	5.66	-3.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	9.16	-6.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	4.86	-3.56
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.64	9.77	-6.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.85	46.08	-34.22

SAA vs. BENJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAA Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is lower than the BENJ Sharpe Ratio of 5.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAA and BENJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SAA vs. BENJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAA drawdown since its inception was -87.39%, which is greater than BENJ's maximum drawdown of -0.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAA and BENJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SAA	BENJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.39%	-0.39%	-87.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.21%	-0.39%	-17.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-50.84%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.37%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-74.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.35%	-0.02%	-27.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.59%	0.08%	+5.51%

Volatility

SAA vs. BENJ - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) has a higher volatility of 9.64% compared to Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ) at 0.10%. This indicates that SAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BENJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SAA	BENJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.64%	0.10%	+9.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.50%	0.24%	+24.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.09%	0.67%	+35.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.52%	0.60%	+42.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.15%	0.60%	+45.55%

SAA vs. BENJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAA has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BENJ's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

SAA vs. BENJ - Dividend Comparison

SAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, while BENJ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BENJ Horizon Landmark ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SAA ProShares Ultra SmallCap600	0.72%	1.05%	1.36%	0.88%	0.46%	0.00%	0.03%	0.35%	0.27%	0.00%	0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SAA and BENJ in my portfolio?

SAA and BENJ have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SAA or BENJ?

SAA has higher volatility (9.64%) compared to BENJ (0.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAA dropped -87.39% vs BENJ's -0.39%.

Which ETF is better, SAA or BENJ?

On 1-year performance, SAA leads with 65.99% vs 3.80% for BENJ. On fees, BENJ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, BENJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SAA or BENJ?

Over the 1-year period, SAA has performed better with a 65.99% return vs 3.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SAA or BENJ?

BENJ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SAA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SAA or BENJ?

SAA has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.00% for BENJ.

What is the main difference between SAA and BENJ?

SAA is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BENJ is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SAA and 0.40% for BENJ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BENJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.66 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.