PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RZV vs. VSCAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RZV vs. VSCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) and Invesco Small Cap Value Fund (VSCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RZV achieves a 28.27% return, which is significantly higher than VSCAX's 22.92% return. Over the past 10 years, RZV has underperformed VSCAX with an annualized return of 10.83%, while VSCAX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.04% annualized return.


RZV

1D
1.82%
1M
2.39%
6M
16.91%
YTD
28.27%
1Y
48.09%
3Y*
16.77%
5Y*
12.95%
10Y*
10.83%
ALL TIME*
8.35%

VSCAX

1D
1.07%
1M
-3.62%
6M
9.89%
YTD
22.92%
1Y
44.67%
3Y*
24.54%
5Y*
19.78%
10Y*
17.04%
ALL TIME*
12.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.90M$1.80M$1.00M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RZV vs. VSCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RZV
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF
28.27%8.65%5.06%22.97%-6.80%45.95%-3.88%22.29%-19.66%1.25%
VSCAX
Invesco Small Cap Value Fund
22.92%17.70%24.54%22.84%4.31%36.34%10.81%32.02%-25.64%18.17%

Correlation

The correlation between RZV and VSCAX is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2006

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between RZV and VSCAX has dropped to 0.62 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RZV vs. VSCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RZV
RZV Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
RZV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RZV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
RZV Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
RZV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
RZV Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

VSCAX
VSCAX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VSCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VSCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RZV vs. VSCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) and Invesco Small Cap Value Fund (VSCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RZVVSCAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.30

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

3.48

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.98

10.84

+2.15

RZV vs. VSCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RZV Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the VSCAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RZV and VSCAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RZV vs. VSCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RZV drawdown since its inception was -77.11%, which is greater than VSCAX's maximum drawdown of -57.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RZV and VSCAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RZVVSCAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.11%

-57.77%

-19.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.56%

-12.11%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.81%

-25.29%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.81%

-25.29%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.42%

-57.77%

-2.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-8.74%

+7.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.50%

-8.87%

-4.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.71%

3.88%

-0.17%

Volatility

RZV vs. VSCAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) is 5.09%, while Invesco Small Cap Value Fund (VSCAX) has a volatility of 7.73%. This indicates that RZV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VSCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RZVVSCAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.09%

7.73%

-2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.81%

18.55%

-4.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.11%

23.31%

-3.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.09%

23.43%

+0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.89%

26.72%

+0.17%

RZV vs. VSCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RZV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than VSCAX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

RZV vs. VSCAX - Dividend Comparison

RZV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than VSCAX's 7.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RZV
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF
1.37%1.59%1.14%1.13%1.43%0.86%0.63%1.03%2.03%1.02%0.46%1.24%
VSCAX
Invesco Small Cap Value Fund
7.50%9.22%7.90%4.93%10.12%16.90%0.30%2.53%28.45%16.65%1.71%11.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


RZV and VSCAX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSCAX has higher volatility (7.73%) compared to RZV (5.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RZV dropped -77.11% vs VSCAX's -57.77%.

RZV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RZV and VSCAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer