PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RZV vs. SOXQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RZV vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RZV achieves a 19.32% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 92.48% return.


RZV

1D
1.31%
1M
3.43%
YTD
19.32%
6M
17.69%
1Y
45.33%
3Y*
19.15%
5Y*
9.13%
10Y*
10.50%

SOXQ

1D
-2.15%
1M
24.08%
YTD
92.48%
6M
89.00%
1Y
171.59%
3Y*
59.09%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RZV vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RZV
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF
19.32%8.65%5.06%22.97%-6.80%-1.64%
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
92.48%43.11%20.16%66.74%-35.59%24.82%

Correlation

The correlation between RZV and SOXQ is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021

0.51

The correlation between RZV and SOXQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

RZV vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RZV
SOXQ

Consumer Cyclical

26.1%

-

Industrials

15.7%

-

Energy

9.7%

-

Technology

8.9%
100.0%

Healthcare

8.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.7%

-

Financial Services

7.3%
0.0%

Basic Materials

6.4%

-

Real Estate

5.0%

-

Communication Services

4.2%

-

Utilities

0.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

RZV
26.1%
SOXQ

-

Industrials

RZV
15.7%
SOXQ

-

Energy

RZV
9.7%
SOXQ

-

Technology

RZV
8.9%
SOXQ
100.0%

Healthcare

RZV
8.8%
SOXQ

-

Consumer Defensive

RZV
7.7%
SOXQ

-

Financial Services

RZV
7.3%
SOXQ
0.0%

Basic Materials

RZV
6.4%
SOXQ

-

Real Estate

RZV
5.0%
SOXQ

-

Communication Services

RZV
4.2%
SOXQ

-

Utilities

RZV
0.4%
SOXQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RZV vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RZV
RZV Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
RZV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RZV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
RZV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
RZV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
RZV Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXQ
SOXQ Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SOXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RZV vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RZVSOXQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.69

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

11.08

-7.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.80

42.47

-30.66

RZV vs. SOXQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RZV Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is lower than the SOXQ Sharpe Ratio of 5.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RZV and SOXQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RZVSOXQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

5.11

-2.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.96

-0.69

Drawdowns

RZV vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RZV drawdown since its inception was -77.11%, which is greater than SOXQ's maximum drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RZV and SOXQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RZVSOXQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.11%

-46.01%

-31.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.56%

-15.59%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.81%

-39.36%

+9.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.15%

+2.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.60%

-12.95%

-0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

4.06%

-0.21%

Volatility

RZV vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) is 5.27%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 13.55%. This indicates that RZV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RZVSOXQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.27%

13.55%

-8.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.71%

26.81%

-13.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.67%

33.80%

-13.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.37%

36.38%

-12.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.03%

36.38%

-9.35%

RZV vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RZV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

RZV vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison

RZV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, more than SOXQ's 0.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RZV
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF
1.33%1.59%1.14%1.13%1.43%0.86%0.63%1.03%2.03%1.02%0.46%1.24%
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
0.26%0.50%0.68%0.87%1.36%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RZV and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXQ has higher volatility (13.55%) compared to RZV (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RZV dropped -77.11% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.

On 3-year performance, SOXQ leads with 59.09% vs 19.15% for RZV. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, RZV has been the lower-risk option at 5.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 59.09% return vs 19.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RZV.

RZV has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.26% for SOXQ.

RZV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. RZV tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Pure Value, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RZV and 0.19% for SOXQ.

SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.11 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RZV and SOXQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer