RZV vs. SOXQ
RZV (Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RZV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P Small Cap 600 Pure Value, while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RZV returned 19.15%/yr vs 59.09%/yr for SOXQ. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RZV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.
Performance
RZV vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RZV achieves a 19.32% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 92.48% return.
RZV
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- YTD
- 19.32%
- 6M
- 17.69%
- 1Y
- 45.33%
- 3Y*
- 19.15%
- 5Y*
- 9.13%
- 10Y*
- 10.50%
SOXQ
- 1D
- -2.15%
- 1M
- 24.08%
- YTD
- 92.48%
- 6M
- 89.00%
- 1Y
- 171.59%
- 3Y*
- 59.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RZV vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RZV Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF | 19.32% | 8.65% | 5.06% | 22.97% | -6.80% | -1.64% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 92.48% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 24.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between RZV and SOXQ is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.51 |
The correlation between RZV and SOXQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
RZV vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RZV
SOXQ
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
RZV
SOXQ
-
Industrials
RZV
SOXQ
-
Energy
RZV
SOXQ
-
Technology
RZV
SOXQ
Healthcare
RZV
SOXQ
-
Consumer Defensive
RZV
SOXQ
-
Financial Services
RZV
SOXQ
Basic Materials
RZV
SOXQ
-
Real Estate
RZV
SOXQ
-
Communication Services
RZV
SOXQ
-
Utilities
RZV
SOXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RZV vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
RZV
SOXQ
RZV vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RZV | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.69 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.63 | 11.08 | -7.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.80 | 42.47 | -30.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RZV | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.21 | 5.11 | -2.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.96 | -0.69 |
Drawdowns
RZV vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RZV drawdown since its inception was -77.11%, which is greater than SOXQ's maximum drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RZV and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RZV | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.11% | -46.01% | -31.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.56% | -15.59% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.81% | -39.36% | +9.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.15% | +2.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.60% | -12.95% | -0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.85% | 4.06% | -0.21% |
Volatility
RZV vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) is 5.27%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 13.55%. This indicates that RZV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RZV | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.27% | 13.55% | -8.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.71% | 26.81% | -13.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.67% | 33.80% | -13.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.37% | 36.38% | -12.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.03% | 36.38% | -9.35% |
RZV vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RZV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
RZV vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
RZV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, more than SOXQ's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RZV Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF | 1.33% | 1.59% | 1.14% | 1.13% | 1.43% | 0.86% | 0.63% | 1.03% | 2.03% | 1.02% | 0.46% | 1.24% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.26% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RZV and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXQ has higher volatility (13.55%) compared to RZV (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RZV dropped -77.11% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.
On 3-year performance, SOXQ leads with 59.09% vs 19.15% for RZV. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, RZV has been the lower-risk option at 5.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 59.09% return vs 19.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RZV.
RZV has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.26% for SOXQ.
RZV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. RZV tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Pure Value, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RZV and 0.19% for SOXQ.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.11 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RZV and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer