PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RZLV vs. NBIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RZLV vs. NBIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rezolve AI Ltd (RZLV) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RZLV achieves a -5.45% return, which is significantly lower than NBIS's 127.48% return.


RZLV

1D
2.10%
1M
-14.44%
6M
-5.81%
YTD
-5.45%
1Y
-17.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-53.60%

NBIS

1D
1.05%
1M
-11.69%
6M
123.51%
YTD
127.48%
1Y
266.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
265.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.73B$4.16B$4.21B
$17.91M$24.42M$38.39M

RZLV vs. NBIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
RZLV
Rezolve AI Ltd
-5.45%-32.72%-33.45%
NBIS
Nebius Group N.V.
127.48%202.18%46.25%

Correlation

The correlation between RZLV and NBIS is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2024

0.33

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RZLV:

$649.85M

NBIS:

$45.70B

Total Revenue (TTM)

RZLV:

$6.41M

NBIS:

$877.90M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RZLV:

$6.12M

NBIS:

$420.60M

EBITDA (TTM)

RZLV:

-$99.67M

NBIS:

-$52.78M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RZLV vs. NBIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RZLV
RZLV Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
RZLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RZLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
RZLV Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
RZLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
RZLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

NBIS
NBIS Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
NBIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBIS Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
NBIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBIS Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RZLV vs. NBIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rezolve AI Ltd (RZLV) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RZLVNBISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.34

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

5.21

-5.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.30

11.53

-11.83

RZLV vs. NBIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RZLV Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the NBIS Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RZLV and NBIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RZLV vs. NBIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RZLV drawdown since its inception was -89.63%, which is greater than NBIS's maximum drawdown of -58.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RZLV and NBIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RZLVNBISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.63%

-58.27%

-31.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.15%

-48.30%

-23.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.71%

-33.58%

-44.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.16%

-19.18%

-49.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

56.63%

21.79%

+34.84%

Volatility

RZLV vs. NBIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rezolve AI Ltd (RZLV) is 14.86%, while Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a volatility of 45.48%. This indicates that RZLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RZLVNBISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.86%

45.48%

-30.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

60.67%

83.51%

-22.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

109.78%

113.57%

-3.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

140.72%

113.26%

+27.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

140.72%

113.26%

+27.46%

Dividends

RZLV vs. NBIS - Dividend Comparison

Neither RZLV nor NBIS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

RZLV vs. NBIS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rezolve AI Ltd and Nebius Group N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


RZLV and NBIS have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBIS has higher volatility (45.48%) compared to RZLV (14.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RZLV dropped -89.63% vs NBIS's -58.27%.

NBIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RZLV and NBIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer