PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYWCX vs. RYNVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYWCX vs. RYNVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX) and Rydex Nova Fund (RYNVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYWCX achieves a 27.30% return, which is significantly higher than RYNVX's 13.74% return. Over the past 10 years, RYWCX has underperformed RYNVX with an annualized return of 7.57%, while RYNVX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.32% annualized return.


RYWCX

1D
-0.96%
1M
3.10%
6M
19.34%
YTD
27.30%
1Y
31.94%
3Y*
15.65%
5Y*
4.83%
10Y*
7.57%

RYNVX

1D
-0.78%
1M
2.07%
6M
11.53%
YTD
13.74%
1Y
27.37%
3Y*
25.34%
5Y*
14.98%
10Y*
18.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYWCX vs. RYNVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYWCX
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund
27.30%7.76%7.20%17.03%-30.33%16.37%15.23%11.58%-9.55%15.23%
RYNVX
Rydex Nova Fund
13.74%21.42%33.14%35.31%-29.96%42.56%19.64%45.58%-10.24%31.17%

Correlation

The correlation between RYWCX and RYNVX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005

0.83

The correlation between RYWCX and RYNVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYWCX vs. RYNVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYWCX
RYWCX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
RYWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
RYWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

RYNVX
RYNVX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
RYNVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYNVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYNVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
RYNVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYNVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYWCX vs. RYNVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX) and Rydex Nova Fund (RYNVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYWCXRYNVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.27

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.98

2.06

+1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.88

8.67

+4.21

RYWCX vs. RYNVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYWCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the RYNVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYWCX and RYNVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYWCX vs. RYNVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYWCX drawdown since its inception was -60.64%, smaller than the maximum RYNVX drawdown of -76.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYWCX and RYNVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYWCXRYNVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.64%

-76.54%

+15.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.49%

-13.84%

+5.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.39%

-27.49%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.28%

-40.92%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.65%

-48.58%

-6.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.84%

-1.95%

-1.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.38%

-19.56%

+6.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

3.28%

-0.66%

Volatility

RYWCX vs. RYNVX - Volatility Comparison

Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX) and Rydex Nova Fund (RYNVX) have volatilities of 5.00% and 5.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYWCXRYNVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.00%

5.00%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.16%

15.05%

-0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.73%

18.86%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.92%

26.11%

-3.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.68%

27.36%

-2.68%

RYWCX vs. RYNVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYWCX has a 2.26% expense ratio, which is higher than RYNVX's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYWCX vs. RYNVX - Dividend Comparison

RYWCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RYNVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYNVX
Rydex Nova Fund
0.66%0.76%0.66%0.59%22.11%9.07%0.53%0.00%0.00%1.97%1.22%0.13%
RYWCX
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%14.52%0.00%0.00%59.93%0.00%0.00%9.26%3.92%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYWCX and RYNVX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYNVX has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to RYWCX (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYWCX dropped -60.64% vs RYNVX's -76.54%.

RYWCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYWCX and RYNVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer