RYVPX vs. PNSAX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RYVPX (Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund) and PNSAX (Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RYVPX returned 12.59%/yr vs 17.13%/yr for PNSAX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RYVPX charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.23%/yr for PNSAX.

Performance

RYVPX vs. PNSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund (RYVPX) and Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund (PNSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYVPX achieves a 19.38% return, which is significantly lower than PNSAX's 27.82% return. Over the past 10 years, RYVPX has underperformed PNSAX with an annualized return of 12.59%, while PNSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.13% annualized return.

RYVPX

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 6.16%
• YTD: 19.38%
• 6M: 16.40%
• 1Y: 37.63%
• 3Y*: 22.10%
• 5Y*: 4.38%
• 10Y*: 12.59%

PNSAX

• 1D: 1.96%
• 1M: 9.13%
• YTD: 27.82%
• 6M: 24.45%
• 1Y: 39.31%
• 3Y*: 23.74%
• 5Y*: 10.36%
• 10Y*: 17.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYVPX vs. PNSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RYVPX Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund	19.38%	19.53%	21.81%	16.97%	-32.45%	6.61%	49.45%	23.68%	-10.81%	17.71%
PNSAX Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund	27.82%	8.91%	22.98%	22.87%	-28.10%	14.38%	47.65%	37.60%	-2.46%	20.19%

Correlation

The correlation between RYVPX and PNSAX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2001	0.92

The correlation between RYVPX and PNSAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RYVPX vs. PNSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYVPX

RYVPX Risk / Return Rank: 44
RYVPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
RYVPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
RYVPX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
RYVPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
RYVPX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

PNSAX

PNSAX Risk / Return Rank: 47
PNSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
PNSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
PNSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
PNSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
PNSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYVPX vs. PNSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund (RYVPX) and Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund (PNSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RYVPX	PNSAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	1.73	+0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	2.38	+0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.30	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.55	2.94	-0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.41	10.22	-1.81

RYVPX vs. PNSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYVPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the PNSAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYVPX and PNSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RYVPX vs. PNSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYVPX drawdown since its inception was -59.03%, smaller than the maximum PNSAX drawdown of -69.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYVPX and PNSAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RYVPX	PNSAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.03%	-69.47%	+10.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.22%	-14.00%	-1.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.76%	-26.25%	+0.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.19%	-38.77%	-9.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.19%	-38.77%	-9.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.15%	-23.51%	+10.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.61%	4.02%	+0.59%

Volatility

RYVPX vs. PNSAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund (RYVPX) is 6.93%, while Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund (PNSAX) has a volatility of 8.62%. This indicates that RYVPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PNSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RYVPX	PNSAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.93%	8.62%	-1.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.99%	19.39%	-3.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.95%	23.89%	-2.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.39%	23.46%	+2.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.01%	23.70%	+1.31%

RYVPX vs. PNSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYVPX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than PNSAX's 1.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

RYVPX vs. PNSAX - Dividend Comparison

RYVPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.06%, more than PNSAX's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PNSAX Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund	0.33%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	15.27%	4.87%	1.93%	1.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RYVPX Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund	14.06%	16.79%	2.92%	0.00%	4.34%	34.97%	10.32%	3.47%	45.66%	20.89%	11.40%	24.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RYVPX and PNSAX in my portfolio?

RYVPX and PNSAX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RYVPX or PNSAX?

PNSAX has higher volatility (8.62%) compared to RYVPX (6.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYVPX dropped -59.03% vs PNSAX's -69.47%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RYVPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.