PNSAX vs. TCMSX

In the year-to-date period, PNSAX achieves a -5.47% return, which is significantly higher than TCMSX's -11.59% return. Over the past 10 years, PNSAX has outperformed TCMSX with an annualized return of 8.18%, while TCMSX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.37% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

PNSAX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than TCMSX's 0.93% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund (PNSAX) and Voya Small Cap Growth Fund (TCMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current PNSAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is higher than the TCMSX Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PNSAX and TCMSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

PNSAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TCMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%.

The maximum PNSAX drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, roughly equal to the maximum TCMSX drawdown of -60.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNSAX and TCMSX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund (PNSAX) is 7.43%, while Voya Small Cap Growth Fund (TCMSX) has a volatility of 8.13%. This indicates that PNSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TCMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.