RYVPX vs. CMCIX
RYVPX (Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund) and CMCIX (Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past year, RYVPX returned 32.60% vs -0.28% for CMCIX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RYVPX charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for CMCIX.
Performance
RYVPX vs. CMCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYVPX achieves a 16.05% return, which is significantly higher than CMCIX's 2.66% return.
RYVPX
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 7.49%
- YTD
- 16.05%
- 6M
- 18.98%
- 1Y
- 32.60%
- 3Y*
- 21.15%
- 5Y*
- 4.39%
- 10Y*
- 11.99%
CMCIX
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 2.66%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- -0.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RYVPX vs. CMCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RYVPX Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund | 16.05% | 19.53% | 21.81% | 9.95% |
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 2.66% | -5.28% | 10.46% | 7.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between RYVPX and CMCIX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023 | 0.78 |
The correlation between RYVPX and CMCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RYVPX vs. CMCIX — Risk / Return Rank
RYVPX
CMCIX
RYVPX vs. CMCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund (RYVPX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RYVPX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.02 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.25 | 0.09 | +2.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.44 | 0.20 | +7.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RYVPX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 0.07 | +1.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.34 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
RYVPX vs. CMCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYVPX drawdown since its inception was -59.03%, which is greater than CMCIX's maximum drawdown of -21.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYVPX and CMCIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYVPX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.03% | -21.50% | -37.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.22% | -11.68% | -3.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -9.96% | +9.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.17% | -6.45% | -6.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.60% | 4.99% | -0.39% |
Volatility
RYVPX vs. CMCIX - Volatility Comparison
Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund (RYVPX) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX) at 3.90%. This indicates that RYVPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RYVPX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | 3.90% | +0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.30% | 10.59% | +4.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.21% | 15.15% | +5.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.26% | 16.54% | +9.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.95% | 16.54% | +8.41% |
RYVPX vs. CMCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RYVPX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than CMCIX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
RYVPX vs. CMCIX - Dividend Comparison
RYVPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.47%, more than CMCIX's 4.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 4.14% | 4.25% | 7.13% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RYVPX Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund | 14.47% | 16.79% | 2.92% | 0.00% | 4.34% | 34.97% | 10.32% | 3.47% | 45.66% | 20.89% | 11.40% | 24.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RYVPX and CMCIX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RYVPX has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to CMCIX (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYVPX dropped -59.03% vs CMCIX's -21.50%.
RYVPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RYVPX and CMCIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer