PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYVPX vs. ALFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYVPX vs. ALFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund (RYVPX) and Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund (ALFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYVPX achieves a 16.05% return, which is significantly lower than ALFAX's 18.69% return. Over the past 10 years, RYVPX has outperformed ALFAX with an annualized return of 11.99%, while ALFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.51% annualized return.


RYVPX

1D
0.89%
1M
7.49%
YTD
16.05%
6M
18.98%
1Y
32.60%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
4.39%
10Y*
11.99%

ALFAX

1D
0.76%
1M
4.83%
YTD
18.69%
6M
18.13%
1Y
32.77%
3Y*
15.74%
5Y*
5.22%
10Y*
10.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYVPX vs. ALFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYVPX
Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund
16.05%19.53%21.81%16.97%-32.45%6.61%49.45%23.68%-10.81%17.71%
ALFAX
Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund
18.69%8.80%13.18%13.92%-23.50%15.01%26.16%24.95%-9.72%20.61%

Correlation

The correlation between RYVPX and ALFAX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2001

0.92

The correlation between RYVPX and ALFAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYVPX vs. ALFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYVPX
RYVPX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
RYVPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYVPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYVPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
RYVPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYVPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

ALFAX
ALFAX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
ALFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
ALFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYVPX vs. ALFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund (RYVPX) and Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund (ALFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYVPXALFAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.70

2.03

-0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.40

2.87

-0.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.35

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

3.31

-1.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.44

12.75

-5.31

RYVPX vs. ALFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYVPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the ALFAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYVPX and ALFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYVPXALFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

2.03

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.26

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.51

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.43

+0.06

Drawdowns

RYVPX vs. ALFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYVPX drawdown since its inception was -59.03%, roughly equal to the maximum ALFAX drawdown of -57.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYVPX and ALFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYVPXALFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.03%

-57.11%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.22%

-10.31%

-4.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.76%

-25.01%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.19%

-33.88%

-14.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.19%

-40.29%

-7.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.31%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.17%

-12.87%

-0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.60%

2.67%

+1.93%

Volatility

RYVPX vs. ALFAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund (RYVPX) is 4.84%, while Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund (ALFAX) has a volatility of 5.84%. This indicates that RYVPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYVPXALFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

5.84%

-1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.30%

13.10%

+2.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.21%

16.86%

+3.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.26%

19.86%

+6.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.95%

20.72%

+4.23%

RYVPX vs. ALFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYVPX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ALFAX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYVPX vs. ALFAX - Dividend Comparison

RYVPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.47%, more than ALFAX's 4.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALFAX
Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund
4.47%5.30%0.80%0.46%6.94%5.38%7.99%14.66%16.61%11.96%11.85%15.83%
RYVPX
Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund
14.47%16.79%2.92%0.00%4.34%34.97%10.32%3.47%45.66%20.89%11.40%24.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, RYVPX and ALFAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ALFAX has higher volatility (5.84%) compared to RYVPX (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYVPX dropped -59.03% vs ALFAX's -57.11%.

ALFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYVPX and ALFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer