PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYVFX vs. SSCVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYVFX vs. SSCVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Royce Small-Cap Value Fund (RYVFX) and Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYVFX achieves a 21.07% return, which is significantly lower than SSCVX's 27.34% return. Over the past 10 years, RYVFX has underperformed SSCVX with an annualized return of 8.87%, while SSCVX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.95% annualized return.


RYVFX

1D
-0.67%
1M
1.20%
6M
15.26%
YTD
21.07%
1Y
36.49%
3Y*
13.88%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*
8.87%
ALL TIME*
8.58%

SSCVX

1D
1.14%
1M
0.52%
6M
19.06%
YTD
27.34%
1Y
39.97%
3Y*
14.32%
5Y*
8.97%
10Y*
9.95%
ALL TIME*
7.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RYVFX vs. SSCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYVFX
Royce Small-Cap Value Fund
21.07%6.77%3.20%26.40%-10.18%28.15%-6.47%18.26%-7.37%4.93%
SSCVX
Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund
27.34%5.46%12.33%12.47%-15.35%31.25%9.61%18.76%-13.70%12.65%

Correlation

The correlation between RYVFX and SSCVX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2002

0.90

The correlation between RYVFX and SSCVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYVFX vs. SSCVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RYVFX
RYVFX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
RYVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
RYVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SSCVX
SSCVX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SSCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SSCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RYVFX vs. SSCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce Small-Cap Value Fund (RYVFX) and Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYVFXSSCVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.37

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

4.67

-1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.82

14.87

-5.05

RYVFX vs. SSCVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYVFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the SSCVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYVFX and SSCVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYVFX vs. SSCVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYVFX drawdown since its inception was -57.72%, smaller than the maximum SSCVX drawdown of -65.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYVFX and SSCVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYVFXSSCVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.72%

-65.34%

+7.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.17%

-7.88%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.20%

-29.22%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.20%

-29.22%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.56%

-48.87%

+0.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.51%

-0.38%

-1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.74%

-11.79%

+2.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

2.52%

+0.88%

Volatility

RYVFX vs. SSCVX - Volatility Comparison

Royce Small-Cap Value Fund (RYVFX) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX) at 3.30%. This indicates that RYVFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSCVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYVFXSSCVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

3.30%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.52%

11.93%

-1.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.70%

17.30%

-0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.31%

21.04%

-0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.39%

23.35%

-0.96%

RYVFX vs. SSCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYVFX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SSCVX's 1.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYVFX vs. SSCVX - Dividend Comparison

RYVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.40%, less than SSCVX's 8.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYVFX
Royce Small-Cap Value Fund
8.40%10.17%6.03%8.20%6.02%5.77%3.92%3.19%13.14%3.45%5.59%19.64%
SSCVX
Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund
8.61%10.96%20.45%6.56%4.62%6.64%6.45%0.12%7.59%13.50%6.18%12.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYVFX and SSCVX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYVFX has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to SSCVX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYVFX dropped -57.72% vs SSCVX's -65.34%.

SSCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYVFX and SSCVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer