PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYVFX vs. SSCVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYVFX vs. SSCVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Royce Small-Cap Value Fund (RYVFX) and Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYVFX achieves a 16.03% return, which is significantly lower than SSCVX's 19.72% return. Over the past 10 years, RYVFX has underperformed SSCVX with an annualized return of 8.80%, while SSCVX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.56% annualized return.


RYVFX

1D
-0.70%
1M
1.71%
YTD
16.03%
6M
15.15%
1Y
36.88%
3Y*
16.43%
5Y*
8.18%
10Y*
8.80%

SSCVX

1D
-1.14%
1M
0.30%
YTD
19.72%
6M
17.54%
1Y
35.63%
3Y*
15.61%
5Y*
6.61%
10Y*
9.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYVFX vs. SSCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYVFX
Royce Small-Cap Value Fund
16.03%6.77%3.20%26.40%-10.18%28.15%-6.47%18.26%-7.37%4.93%
SSCVX
Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund
19.72%5.46%12.33%12.47%-15.35%31.25%9.61%18.76%-13.70%12.65%

Correlation

The correlation between RYVFX and SSCVX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2002

0.90

The correlation between RYVFX and SSCVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYVFX vs. SSCVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYVFX
RYVFX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
RYVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
RYVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

SSCVX
SSCVX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SSCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
SSCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYVFX vs. SSCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce Small-Cap Value Fund (RYVFX) and Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYVFXSSCVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.34

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.94

4.42

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.41

13.61

-3.20

RYVFX vs. SSCVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYVFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the SSCVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYVFX and SSCVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYVFXSSCVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

2.00

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.31

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.41

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.33

+0.04

Drawdowns

RYVFX vs. SSCVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYVFX drawdown since its inception was -57.72%, smaller than the maximum SSCVX drawdown of -65.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYVFX and SSCVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYVFXSSCVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.72%

-65.34%

+7.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.17%

-7.88%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.20%

-29.22%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.20%

-29.22%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.56%

-48.87%

+0.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-2.11%

+1.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.80%

-11.84%

+2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.47%

2.55%

+0.92%

Volatility

RYVFX vs. SSCVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Royce Small-Cap Value Fund (RYVFX) is 4.24%, while Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that RYVFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSCVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYVFXSSCVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

4.83%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.09%

11.95%

-0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.52%

17.46%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.45%

21.21%

-0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.47%

23.46%

-0.99%

RYVFX vs. SSCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYVFX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SSCVX's 1.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYVFX vs. SSCVX - Dividend Comparison

RYVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.76%, less than SSCVX's 9.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYVFX
Royce Small-Cap Value Fund
8.76%10.17%6.03%8.20%6.02%5.77%3.92%3.19%13.14%3.45%5.59%19.64%
SSCVX
Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund
9.16%10.96%20.45%6.56%4.62%6.64%6.45%0.12%7.59%13.50%6.18%12.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYVFX and SSCVX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSCVX has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to RYVFX (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYVFX dropped -57.72% vs SSCVX's -65.34%.

RYVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYVFX and SSCVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer