PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYTNX vs. RYGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYTNX vs. RYGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTNX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYTNX achieves a 15.80% return, which is significantly lower than RYGRX's 35.24% return. Over the past 10 years, RYTNX has outperformed RYGRX with an annualized return of 23.22%, while RYGRX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.07% annualized return.


RYTNX

1D
-0.75%
1M
-0.47%
YTD
15.80%
6M
13.53%
1Y
44.81%
3Y*
33.72%
5Y*
17.30%
10Y*
23.22%

RYGRX

1D
1.49%
1M
10.34%
YTD
35.24%
6M
32.32%
1Y
42.19%
3Y*
27.04%
5Y*
10.59%
10Y*
14.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYTNX vs. RYGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYTNX
Rydex S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund
15.80%24.88%41.95%45.20%-39.32%55.55%20.31%62.29%-15.06%42.95%
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
35.24%11.00%25.73%5.80%-28.71%26.61%26.34%34.13%-6.28%23.74%

Correlation

The correlation between RYTNX and RYGRX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005

0.91

The correlation between RYTNX and RYGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYTNX vs. RYGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYTNX
RYTNX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
RYTNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYTNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYTNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
RYTNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYTNX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

RYGRX
RYGRX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
RYGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
RYGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYTNX vs. RYGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTNX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYTNXRYGRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.36

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

3.96

-1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.03

14.75

-3.72

RYTNX vs. RYGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYTNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the RYGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYTNX and RYGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYTNX vs. RYGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYTNX drawdown since its inception was -86.64%, which is greater than RYGRX's maximum drawdown of -54.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYTNX and RYGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYTNXRYGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.64%

-54.22%

-32.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.43%

-11.17%

-7.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.36%

-24.95%

-10.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.01%

-36.57%

-10.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.23%

-36.63%

-22.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.91%

0.00%

-3.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.49%

-9.39%

-19.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.33%

2.99%

+1.34%

Volatility

RYTNX vs. RYGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rydex S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTNX) is 9.37%, while Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) has a volatility of 9.88%. This indicates that RYTNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYTNXRYGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.37%

9.88%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.65%

18.39%

+1.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.96%

21.58%

+3.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.93%

23.83%

+10.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.26%

23.05%

+13.21%

RYTNX vs. RYGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYTNX has a 1.82% expense ratio, which is lower than RYGRX's 2.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYTNX vs. RYGRX - Dividend Comparison

RYTNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, more than RYGRX's 3.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
3.76%5.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.81%4.43%12.10%7.15%6.26%0.05%2.96%
RYTNX
Rydex S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund
4.14%4.79%5.45%0.14%0.00%0.14%0.69%1.84%0.00%5.84%0.16%1.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYTNX and RYGRX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYGRX has higher volatility (9.88%) compared to RYTNX (9.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYTNX dropped -86.64% vs RYGRX's -54.22%.

RYGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYTNX and RYGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer