PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYTNX vs. RMQAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYTNX vs. RMQAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTNX) and Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYTNX achieves a 15.52% return, which is significantly lower than RMQAX's 17.71% return. Over the past 10 years, RYTNX has underperformed RMQAX with an annualized return of 21.81%, while RMQAX has yielded a comparatively higher 34.08% annualized return.


RYTNX

1D
1.37%
1M
-0.24%
6M
11.77%
YTD
15.52%
1Y
35.71%
3Y*
29.42%
5Y*
15.62%
10Y*
21.81%
ALL TIME*
9.50%

RMQAX

1D
1.29%
1M
-7.73%
6M
13.82%
YTD
17.71%
1Y
41.27%
3Y*
36.09%
5Y*
18.27%
10Y*
34.08%
ALL TIME*
31.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RYTNX vs. RMQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYTNX
Rydex S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund
15.52%24.88%41.95%45.20%-39.32%55.55%20.31%62.29%-15.06%42.95%
RMQAX
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund
17.71%33.92%44.76%115.91%-59.93%56.36%101.06%80.80%-7.28%69.80%

Correlation

The correlation between RYTNX and RMQAX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.91

The correlation between RYTNX and RMQAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYTNX vs. RMQAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RYTNX
RYTNX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
RYTNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYTNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYTNX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
RYTNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYTNX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

RMQAX
RMQAX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
RMQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
RMQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RYTNX vs. RMQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTNX) and Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYTNXRMQAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.18

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

1.44

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.83

4.42

+2.42

RYTNX vs. RMQAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYTNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the RMQAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYTNX and RMQAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYTNX vs. RMQAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYTNX drawdown since its inception was -86.64%, which is greater than RMQAX's maximum drawdown of -63.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYTNX and RMQAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYTNXRMQAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.64%

-63.18%

-23.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.43%

-24.96%

+6.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.36%

-42.45%

+7.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.01%

-63.18%

+16.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.23%

-63.18%

+3.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.14%

-16.01%

+11.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.38%

-12.85%

-15.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.60%

8.10%

-3.50%

Volatility

RYTNX vs. RMQAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rydex S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTNX) is 7.02%, while Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX) has a volatility of 14.50%. This indicates that RYTNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYTNXRMQAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.02%

14.50%

-7.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.20%

32.55%

-12.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.70%

39.25%

-13.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.97%

47.22%

-13.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.17%

46.82%

-10.65%

RYTNX vs. RMQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYTNX has a 1.82% expense ratio, which is higher than RMQAX's 1.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYTNX vs. RMQAX - Dividend Comparison

RYTNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, less than RMQAX's 30.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RMQAX
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund
30.81%36.27%26.02%3.76%0.00%2.18%5.30%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RYTNX
Rydex S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund
4.15%4.79%5.45%0.14%0.00%0.14%0.69%1.84%0.00%5.84%0.16%1.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, RYTNX and RMQAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RMQAX has higher volatility (14.50%) compared to RYTNX (7.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYTNX dropped -86.64% vs RMQAX's -63.18%.

RYTNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYTNX and RMQAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer