PRGFX vs. RSP

In the year-to-date period, PRGFX achieves a -9.98% return, which is significantly lower than RSP's -3.84% return. Over the past 10 years, PRGFX has underperformed RSP with an annualized return of 5.41%, while RSP has yielded a comparatively higher 9.27% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

PRGFX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Growth Stock Fund (PRGFX) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current PRGFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRGFX and RSP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

PRGFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%.

The maximum PRGFX drawdown since its inception was -57.19%, roughly equal to the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRGFX and RSP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

T. Rowe Price Growth Stock Fund (PRGFX) has a higher volatility of 15.84% compared to Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 12.78%. This indicates that PRGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.