PRGFX vs. TRBCX
PRGFX (T. Rowe Price Growth Stock Fund) and TRBCX (T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from T. Rowe Price. Over the past 10 years, PRGFX returned 14.72%/yr vs 16.29%/yr for TRBCX. Their 0.98 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. PRGFX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for TRBCX.
Performance
PRGFX vs. TRBCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRGFX achieves a -1.45% return, which is significantly higher than TRBCX's -3.32% return. Over the past 10 years, PRGFX has underperformed TRBCX with an annualized return of 14.72%, while TRBCX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.29% annualized return.
PRGFX
- 1D
- 2.64%
- 1M
- -3.03%
- 6M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- -1.45%
- 1Y
- 7.06%
- 3Y*
- 18.65%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- 14.72%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.48%
TRBCX
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- -2.45%
- 6M
- -1.39%
- YTD
- -3.32%
- 1Y
- 5.18%
- 3Y*
- 22.26%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 16.29%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.96%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
PRGFX vs. TRBCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRGFX T. Rowe Price Growth Stock Fund | -1.45% | 15.64% | 38.36% | 45.33% | -40.12% | 19.86% | 36.92% | 30.83% | -1.04% | 33.57% |
TRBCX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund | -3.32% | 18.78% | 48.46% | 49.42% | -38.57% | 17.54% | 34.73% | 29.97% | 2.00% | 36.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRGFX and TRBCX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 1993 | 0.98 |
The correlation between PRGFX and TRBCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRGFX vs. TRBCX — Risk / Return Rank
PRGFX
TRBCX
PRGFX vs. TRBCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Growth Stock Fund (PRGFX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRGFX | TRBCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.05 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.29 | 0.22 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.84 | 0.65 | +0.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRGFX vs. TRBCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRGFX drawdown since its inception was -54.01%, roughly equal to the maximum TRBCX drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRGFX and TRBCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRGFX | TRBCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.01% | -54.56% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.02% | -17.01% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.69% | -23.08% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.44% | -43.63% | -2.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.44% | -43.63% | -2.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.28% | -8.98% | +0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.65% | -11.28% | +0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.08% | 5.65% | +0.43% |
Volatility
PRGFX vs. TRBCX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock Fund (PRGFX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX) have volatilities of 5.92% and 5.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRGFX | TRBCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.92% | 5.92% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.13% | 15.42% | -1.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.74% | 18.58% | -0.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.33% | 24.27% | -0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.18% | 22.88% | -0.70% |
PRGFX vs. TRBCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRGFX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than TRBCX's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRGFX vs. TRBCX - Dividend Comparison
PRGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.78%, more than TRBCX's 5.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRGFX T. Rowe Price Growth Stock Fund | 13.78% | 13.58% | 13.26% | 3.34% | 3.55% | 9.34% | 3.51% | 1.81% | 9.09% | 13.57% | 2.22% | 7.23% |
TRBCX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund | 5.43% | 5.25% | 18.16% | 3.49% | 5.87% | 9.38% | 1.19% | 0.36% | 2.44% | 2.94% | 0.67% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, PRGFX and TRBCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TRBCX has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to PRGFX (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRGFX dropped -54.01% vs TRBCX's -54.56%.
PRGFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.29 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRGFX and TRBCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer