RYCZX vs. RYGRX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

RYCZX (Rydex Inverse Dow 2x Strategy Fund) and RYGRX (Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - RYCZX is a Inverse Equities fund managed by Rydex Funds, while RYGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Rydex Funds. Over the past 10 years, RYCZX returned -25.60%/yr vs 11.74%/yr for RYGRX. Their -0.82 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. RYCZX charges 2.70%/yr vs 2.26%/yr for RYGRX.

Performance

RYCZX vs. RYGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Inverse Dow 2x Strategy Fund (RYCZX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYCZX achieves a -15.64% return, which is significantly lower than RYGRX's 18.58% return. Over the past 10 years, RYCZX has underperformed RYGRX with an annualized return of -25.60%, while RYGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.74% annualized return.

RYCZX

• 1D: -2.34%
• 1M: 2.78%
• 6M: -12.90%
• YTD: -15.64%
• 1Y: -29.67%
• 3Y*: -20.73%
• 5Y*: -16.29%
• 10Y*: -25.60%
• ALL TIME*: -23.06%

RYGRX

• 1D: 5.27%
• 1M: -6.70%
• 6M: 13.58%
• YTD: 18.58%
• 1Y: 19.41%
• 3Y*: 18.75%
• 5Y*: 6.12%
• 10Y*: 11.74%
• ALL TIME*: 9.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RYCZX Rydex Inverse Dow 2x Strategy Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
RYGRX Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

RYCZX vs. RYGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RYCZX Rydex Inverse Dow 2x Strategy Fund	-15.64%	-22.14%	-16.97%	-19.05%	5.48%	-36.32%	-45.37%	-36.65%	0.75%	-39.59%
RYGRX Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund	18.58%	11.00%	25.73%	5.80%	-28.71%	26.61%	26.34%	34.13%	-6.28%	23.74%

Correlation

The correlation between RYCZX and RYGRX is -0.63, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.63
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	-0.68
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	-0.75
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	-0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005	-0.82

The correlation between RYCZX and RYGRX shifts across timeframes, from -0.82 (all time) to -0.63 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RYCZX vs. RYGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RYCZX

RYCZX Risk / Return Rank: 0
RYCZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
RYCZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
RYCZX Omega Ratio Rank: 0
RYCZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
RYCZX Martin Ratio Rank: 0

RYGRX

RYGRX Risk / Return Rank: 21
RYGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
RYGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
RYGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
RYGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
RYGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RYCZX vs. RYGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Inverse Dow 2x Strategy Fund (RYCZX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RYCZX	RYGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.07	0.66	-1.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.50	1.06	-2.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	1.13	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.84	0.96	-1.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.42	4.03	-5.45

RYCZX vs. RYGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYCZX Sharpe Ratio is -1.07, which is lower than the RYGRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYCZX and RYGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RYCZX vs. RYGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYCZX drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, which is greater than RYGRX's maximum drawdown of -54.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYCZX and RYGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RYCZX	RYGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.80%	-54.22%	-45.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.00%	-17.01%	-14.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-60.61%	-24.95%	-35.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-68.62%	-36.57%	-32.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-95.14%	-36.63%	-58.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.79%	-12.64%	-87.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-78.99%	-9.38%	-69.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.84%	4.08%	+14.76%

Volatility

RYCZX vs. RYGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rydex Inverse Dow 2x Strategy Fund (RYCZX) is 7.38%, while Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) has a volatility of 10.93%. This indicates that RYCZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RYCZX	RYGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.38%	10.93%	-3.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.78%	22.15%	-2.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.10%	24.88%	+0.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.66%	24.47%	+5.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.21%	23.34%	+11.87%

RYCZX vs. RYGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYCZX has a 2.70% expense ratio, which is higher than RYGRX's 2.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

RYCZX vs. RYGRX - Dividend Comparison

RYCZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%, more than RYGRX's 4.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RYCZX Rydex Inverse Dow 2x Strategy Fund	6.97%	5.88%	4.32%	1.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.05%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RYGRX Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund	4.29%	5.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.81%	4.43%	12.10%	7.15%	6.26%	0.05%	2.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RYCZX and RYGRX in my portfolio?

RYCZX and RYGRX have a correlation of -0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RYCZX or RYGRX?

RYGRX has higher volatility (10.93%) compared to RYCZX (7.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYCZX dropped -99.80% vs RYGRX's -54.22%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RYGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.