RYCZX vs. RYCKX
Compare and contrast key facts about Rydex Inverse Dow 2x Strategy Fund (RYCZX) and Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX).
RYCZX is managed by Rydex Funds. It was launched on Feb 19, 2004. RYCKX is managed by Rydex Funds. It was launched on Feb 20, 2004.
Performance
RYCZX vs. RYCKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RYCZX vs. RYCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYCZX Rydex Inverse Dow 2x Strategy Fund | 12.18% | -22.14% | -16.97% | -19.05% | 5.48% | -36.32% | -45.37% | -36.65% | 0.75% | -39.59% |
RYCKX Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund | 0.34% | 6.61% | 15.10% | 13.97% | -23.05% | 11.26% | 29.72% | 14.60% | -15.17% | 18.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYCZX achieves a 12.18% return, which is significantly higher than RYCKX's 0.34% return. Over the past 10 years, RYCZX has underperformed RYCKX with an annualized return of -24.23%, while RYCKX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.45% annualized return.
RYCZX
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 16.10%
- YTD
- 12.18%
- 6M
- 5.28%
- 1Y
- -15.25%
- 3Y*
- -16.11%
- 5Y*
- -13.94%
- 10Y*
- -24.23%
RYCKX
- 1D
- -1.99%
- 1M
- -9.85%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- 1Y
- 18.58%
- 3Y*
- 11.21%
- 5Y*
- 2.19%
- 10Y*
- 6.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RYCZX vs. RYCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RYCZX has a 2.70% expense ratio, which is higher than RYCKX's 2.26% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RYCZX vs. RYCKX — Risk / Return Rank
RYCZX
RYCKX
RYCZX vs. RYCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Inverse Dow 2x Strategy Fund (RYCZX) and Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RYCZX | RYCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | 0.82 | -1.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | 1.30 | -1.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.17 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 1.21 | -1.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.43 | 5.17 | -5.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RYCZX | RYCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.51 | 0.82 | -1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.48 | 0.10 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.69 | 0.28 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.62 | 0.31 | -0.94 |
Correlation
The correlation between RYCZX and RYCKX is -0.79. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
RYCZX vs. RYCKX - Dividend Comparison
RYCZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.24%, while RYCKX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYCZX Rydex Inverse Dow 2x Strategy Fund | 5.24% | 5.88% | 4.32% | 1.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RYCKX Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 20.92% | 0.00% | 14.34% | 13.66% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 18.93% | 7.60% | 1.72% | 5.90% |
Drawdowns
RYCZX vs. RYCKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYCZX drawdown since its inception was -99.77%, which is greater than RYCKX's maximum drawdown of -52.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYCZX and RYCKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYCZX | RYCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.77% | -52.60% | -47.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.65% | -13.33% | -30.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.67% | -35.98% | -28.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.13% | -44.75% | -50.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.72% | -10.50% | -89.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -78.68% | -9.58% | -69.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.54% | 3.11% | +29.43% |
Volatility
RYCZX vs. RYCKX - Volatility Comparison
Rydex Inverse Dow 2x Strategy Fund (RYCZX) and Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX) have volatilities of 7.96% and 7.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RYCZX | RYCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.96% | 7.64% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.76% | 13.60% | +4.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.31% | 22.74% | +10.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.38% | 22.65% | +6.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.13% | 22.96% | +12.17% |