PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RYCEY vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RYCEY vs. SLV

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

RYCEY (Rolls-Royce Holdings plc) is a stock, while SLV (iShares Silver Trust) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Over the past 10 years, RYCEY returned 8.49%/yr vs 13.99%/yr for SLV. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RYCEY vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYCEY achieves a 12.43% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -4.86% return. Over the past 10 years, RYCEY has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 8.49%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 13.99% annualized return.

RYCEY

1D
1.79%
1M
7.56%
YTD
12.43%
6M
19.66%
1Y
46.06%
3Y*
113.04%
5Y*
61.46%
10Y*
8.49%

SLV

1D
0.77%
1M
-22.76%
YTD
-4.86%
6M
9.25%
1Y
85.39%
3Y*
41.27%
5Y*
18.83%
10Y*
13.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYCEY vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc		12.43%123.64%88.21%253.27%-33.95%2.53%-82.05%-12.69%-7.35%40.70%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust		-4.86%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between RYCEY and SLV is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2014

0.14

The correlation between RYCEY and SLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Rolls-Royce Holdings plc

iShares Silver Trust

Often compared with RYCEY:
RYCEY vs. RR.LRYCEY vs. SMRRYCEY vs. RHM.DERYCEY vs. SPYRYCEY vs. BAESYRYCEY vs. VOORYCEY vs. AAPL
Often compared with SLV:
SLV vs. GLDSLV vs. SIVRSLV vs. PSLVSLV vs. SILSLV vs. SILJSLV vs. SLVPSLV vs. AGQ

Return for Risk

RYCEY vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RYCEY
RYCEY Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
RYCEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYCEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYCEY Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
RYCEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYCEY Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYCEY vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

RYCEYSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.22
1.44

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.90
1.76

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.29

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

1.89

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.98

4.10

+1.87

RYCEY vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYCEY Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYCEY and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYCEY vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYCEY drawdown since its inception was -99.07%, which is greater than SLV's maximum drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYCEY and SLV.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RYCEYSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.07%

-76.28%

-22.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.75%

-45.40%

+23.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.37%

-45.40%

+22.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.01%

-45.40%

-16.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.64%

-45.40%

-49.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.68%

-41.96%

-35.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.15%

-44.66%

-39.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.73%

20.88%

-13.15%

Volatility

RYCEY vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) is 12.00%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.34%. This indicates that RYCEY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RYCEYSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.00%

16.34%

-4.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.70%

59.10%

-26.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.88%

59.82%

-21.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.48%

36.46%

+7.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.35%

32.00%

+17.35%

Dividends

RYCEY vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

RYCEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc		0.72%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.51%1.56%1.32%1.55%4.19%14.44%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

RYCEY and SLV have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (16.34%) compared to RYCEY (12.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYCEY dropped -99.07% vs SLV's -76.28%.

SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYCEY and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer