PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYCEY vs. GSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYCEY vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYCEY achieves a 25.54% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 38.94% return. Over the past 10 years, RYCEY has underperformed GSG with an annualized return of 7.73%, while GSG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.91% annualized return.


RYCEY

1D
0.00%
1M
0.10%
6M
17.33%
YTD
25.54%
1Y
38.67%
3Y*
104.37%
5Y*
71.41%
10Y*
7.73%
ALL TIME*
-10.85%

GSG

1D
0.28%
1M
12.94%
6M
25.75%
YTD
38.94%
1Y
42.34%
3Y*
14.13%
5Y*
14.47%
10Y*
8.91%
ALL TIME*
-2.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$16.60M$17.31M$26.52M
$76.52M$69.38M$55.87M

RYCEY vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
25.54%123.64%88.21%253.27%-33.95%2.53%-82.05%-12.69%-7.35%40.70%
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
38.94%5.93%8.52%-5.51%24.08%38.77%-23.94%15.62%-13.88%3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between RYCEY and GSG is -0.21, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2014

0.16

The correlation between RYCEY and GSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYCEY vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RYCEY
RYCEY Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
RYCEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYCEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYCEY Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
RYCEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYCEY Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

GSG
GSG Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RYCEY vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYCEYGSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.29

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

2.16

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.12

6.99

-1.87

RYCEY vs. GSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYCEY Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the GSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYCEY and GSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYCEY vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYCEY drawdown since its inception was -99.07%, which is greater than GSG's maximum drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYCEY and GSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYCEYGSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.07%

-89.62%

-9.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.75%

-18.81%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.37%

-18.81%

-4.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.01%

-29.12%

-32.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.64%

-57.64%

-37.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-75.08%

-58.05%

-17.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.06%

-63.67%

-20.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.92%

5.84%

+2.08%

Volatility

RYCEY vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison

Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) has a higher volatility of 11.43% compared to iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) at 8.11%. This indicates that RYCEY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYCEYGSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.43%

8.11%

+3.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.98%

22.18%

+11.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.07%

24.23%

+14.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.26%

22.86%

+20.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.12%

22.06%

+27.06%

Dividends

RYCEY vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

RYCEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
0.65%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.51%1.56%1.32%1.55%4.19%14.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYCEY and GSG have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYCEY has higher volatility (11.43%) compared to GSG (8.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYCEY dropped -99.07% vs GSG's -89.62%.

GSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYCEY and GSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer