RYCEY vs. AMLP
RYCEY (Rolls-Royce Holdings plc) is a stock, while AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF) is MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. Over the past 10 years, RYCEY returned 8.49%/yr vs 6.92%/yr for AMLP. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RYCEY vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYCEY achieves a 12.43% return, which is significantly lower than AMLP's 15.29% return. Over the past 10 years, RYCEY has outperformed AMLP with an annualized return of 8.49%, while AMLP has yielded a comparatively lower 6.92% annualized return.
RYCEY
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- 7.56%
- YTD
- 12.43%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 46.06%
- 3Y*
- 113.04%
- 5Y*
- 61.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.49%
AMLP
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- YTD
- 15.29%
- 6M
- 14.35%
- 1Y
- 14.76%
- 3Y*
- 20.22%
- 5Y*
- 15.26%
- 10Y*
- 6.92%
RYCEY vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | 12.43% | 123.64% | 88.21% | 253.27% | -33.95% | 2.53% | -82.05% | -12.69% | -7.35% | 40.70% |
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 15.29% | 5.78% | 22.76% | 21.40% | 25.47% | 39.09% | -32.26% | 5.99% | -12.67% | -7.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between RYCEY and AMLP is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2014 | 0.29 |
The correlation between RYCEY and AMLP shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RYCEY vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank
RYCEY
AMLP
RYCEY vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RYCEY | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.22 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 1.66 | +0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.98 | 5.35 | +0.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RYCEY vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYCEY drawdown since its inception was -99.07%, which is greater than AMLP's maximum drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYCEY and AMLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYCEY | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.07% | -77.19% | -21.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.75% | -8.94% | -12.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.37% | -14.27% | -9.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.01% | -20.92% | -41.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.64% | -72.62% | -22.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.68% | -4.94% | -72.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.15% | -17.37% | -66.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.73% | 2.77% | +4.96% |
Volatility
RYCEY vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) has a higher volatility of 12.00% compared to Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) at 4.71%. This indicates that RYCEY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RYCEY | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.00% | 4.71% | +7.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.70% | 8.77% | +23.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.88% | 11.84% | +26.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.48% | 19.95% | +23.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.35% | 27.67% | +21.68% |
Dividends
RYCEY vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison
RYCEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than AMLP's 7.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 7.71% | 8.36% | 7.70% | 7.86% | 7.70% | 8.55% | 12.31% | 9.12% | 9.29% | 7.97% | 8.09% | 9.84% |
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | 0.72% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.51% | 1.56% | 1.32% | 1.55% | 4.19% | 14.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RYCEY and AMLP have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RYCEY has higher volatility (12.00%) compared to AMLP (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYCEY dropped -99.07% vs AMLP's -77.19%.
AMLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RYCEY and AMLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer