PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYCEY vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RYCEY vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYCEY achieves a 8.80% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 10.79% return. Over the past 10 years, RYCEY has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 7.68%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.65% annualized return.


RYCEY

1D
0.83%
1M
3.97%
YTD
8.80%
6M
17.23%
1Y
40.77%
3Y*
112.66%
5Y*
62.45%
10Y*
7.68%

^GSPC

1D
0.41%
1M
4.48%
YTD
10.79%
6M
10.60%
1Y
27.02%
3Y*
21.07%
5Y*
12.39%
10Y*
13.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYCEY vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
8.80%123.64%88.21%253.27%-33.95%2.53%-82.05%-12.69%-7.35%40.70%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
10.79%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between RYCEY and ^GSPC is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2014

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYCEY vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYCEY
RYCEY Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
RYCEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYCEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYCEY Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
RYCEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYCEY Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYCEY vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYCEY^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.41

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

2.98

-1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.38

13.78

-8.40

RYCEY vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYCEY Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYCEY and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYCEY^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

2.28

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.44

0.74

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

0.76

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.23

0.47

-0.70

Drawdowns

RYCEY vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYCEY drawdown since its inception was -99.07%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYCEY and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYCEY^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.07%

-56.78%

-42.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.75%

-9.10%

-12.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.37%

-18.90%

-4.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.01%

-25.43%

-36.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.64%

-33.92%

-60.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.40%

-0.33%

-78.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.19%

-10.72%

-73.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.61%

1.97%

+5.64%

Volatility

RYCEY vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) has a higher volatility of 13.07% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 2.88%. This indicates that RYCEY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYCEY^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.07%

2.88%

+10.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.78%

9.00%

+23.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.69%

11.89%

+25.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.52%

16.90%

+26.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.33%

18.06%

+31.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYCEY and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYCEY has higher volatility (13.07%) compared to ^GSPC (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYCEY dropped -99.07% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYCEY and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer