PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYCEY vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RYCEY vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYCEY achieves a 25.54% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 9.41% return. Over the past 10 years, RYCEY has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 7.73%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.26% annualized return.


RYCEY

1D
0.00%
1M
0.10%
6M
17.33%
YTD
25.54%
1Y
38.67%
3Y*
104.37%
5Y*
71.41%
10Y*
7.73%
ALL TIME*
-10.85%

^GSPC

1D
0.70%
1M
0.09%
6M
7.94%
YTD
9.41%
1Y
20.07%
3Y*
17.84%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*
13.26%
ALL TIME*
8.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$37.98T$37.61T$41.48T
$76.52M$69.38M$55.87M

RYCEY vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
25.54%123.64%88.21%253.27%-33.95%2.53%-82.05%-12.69%-7.35%40.70%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
9.41%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between RYCEY and ^GSPC is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2014

0.44

The correlation between RYCEY and ^GSPC shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (10 years) to 0.54 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYCEY vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RYCEY
RYCEY Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
RYCEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYCEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYCEY Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
RYCEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYCEY Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RYCEY vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYCEY^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.25

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

2.00

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.12

8.49

-3.37

RYCEY vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYCEY Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYCEY and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYCEY vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYCEY drawdown since its inception was -99.07%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYCEY and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYCEY^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.07%

-56.78%

-42.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.75%

-9.10%

-12.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.37%

-18.90%

-4.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.01%

-25.43%

-36.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.64%

-33.92%

-60.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-75.08%

-1.58%

-73.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.06%

-10.70%

-73.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.92%

2.14%

+5.78%

Volatility

RYCEY vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) has a higher volatility of 11.43% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 3.51%. This indicates that RYCEY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYCEY^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.43%

3.51%

+7.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.98%

10.11%

+23.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.07%

12.87%

+26.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.26%

17.01%

+26.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.12%

18.07%

+31.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYCEY and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYCEY has higher volatility (11.43%) compared to ^GSPC (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYCEY dropped -99.07% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYCEY and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer