PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RY vs. MS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RY vs. MS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Royal Bank of Canada (RY) and Morgan Stanley (MS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RY achieves a 18.68% return, which is significantly lower than MS's 21.88% return. Over the past 10 years, RY has underperformed MS with an annualized return of 17.18%, while MS has yielded a comparatively higher 27.71% annualized return.


RY

1D
0.14%
1M
8.80%
YTD
18.68%
6M
21.99%
1Y
60.93%
3Y*
33.55%
5Y*
18.33%
10Y*
17.18%

MS

1D
0.65%
1M
11.18%
YTD
21.88%
6M
21.28%
1Y
69.28%
3Y*
38.69%
5Y*
22.26%
10Y*
27.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RY vs. MS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RY
Royal Bank of Canada
18.68%46.29%23.80%12.72%-8.00%34.11%8.42%20.17%-12.88%24.95%
MS
Morgan Stanley
21.88%45.16%39.73%13.93%-10.34%46.65%38.09%32.67%-22.76%26.61%

Correlation

The correlation between RY and MS is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 1995

0.47

The correlation between RY and MS shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RY:

$205.02B

MS:

$340.97B

EPS

RY:

CA$18.17

MS:

$11.41

PE Ratio

RY:

15.35

MS:

18.75

PEG Ratio

RY:

2.22

MS:

1.76

PS Ratio

RY:

2.45

MS:

2.84

PB Ratio

RY:

2.21

MS:

3.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

RY:

CA$138.99B

MS:

$120.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RY:

CA$65.64B

MS:

$69.72B

EBITDA (TTM)

RY:

CA$30.01B

MS:

$27.21B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RY vs. MS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RY
RY Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
RY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
RY Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
RY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RY Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

MS
MS Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
MS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MS Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
MS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
MS Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RY vs. MS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royal Bank of Canada (RY) and Morgan Stanley (MS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYMSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

1.43

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.97

3.53

+2.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.22

11.65

+10.56

RY vs. MS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RY Sharpe Ratio is 3.97, which is higher than the MS Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RY and MS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RY vs. MS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RY drawdown since its inception was -62.90%, smaller than the maximum MS drawdown of -88.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RY and MS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYMSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.90%

-88.12%

+25.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.04%

-18.83%

+8.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.88%

-29.24%

+9.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.36%

-32.38%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.95%

-51.33%

+11.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.94%

+1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.32%

-33.69%

+24.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

5.70%

-3.01%

Volatility

RY vs. MS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Royal Bank of Canada (RY) is 4.01%, while Morgan Stanley (MS) has a volatility of 8.62%. This indicates that RY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYMSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

8.62%

-4.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.34%

21.46%

-10.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.10%

25.81%

-10.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.00%

28.75%

-10.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.76%

31.51%

-11.75%

Dividends

RY vs. MS - Dividend Comparison

RY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, more than MS's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MS
Morgan Stanley
1.87%2.17%2.82%3.49%3.47%2.14%2.04%2.54%2.77%1.72%1.66%1.73%
RY
Royal Bank of Canada
2.32%2.54%3.39%4.29%4.07%3.24%3.88%3.88%4.27%3.22%3.95%5.41%

Financials

RY vs. MS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Royal Bank of Canada and Morgan Stanley. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20222023202420252026
33.93B
33.15B
(RY) Total Revenue
(MS) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. RY values in CAD, MS values in USD

RY vs. MS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Royal Bank of Canada and Morgan Stanley over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
48.7%
61.8%
Portfolio components
RY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Bank of Canada reported a gross profit of 16.51B and revenue of 33.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.7%.

MS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morgan Stanley reported a gross profit of 20.48B and revenue of 33.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.8%.

RY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Bank of Canada reported an operating income of 7.10B and revenue of 33.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.9%.

MS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morgan Stanley reported an operating income of 7.01B and revenue of 33.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.2%.

RY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Bank of Canada reported a net income of 5.51B and revenue of 33.93B, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.

MS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morgan Stanley reported a net income of 5.64B and revenue of 33.15B, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RY and MS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MS has higher volatility (8.62%) compared to RY (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RY dropped -62.90% vs MS's -88.12%.

RY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.97 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RY and MS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer