PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RXL vs. UPW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RXL vs. UPW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) and ProShares Ultra Utilities (UPW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RXL achieves a -5.21% return, which is significantly lower than UPW's 1.51% return. Over the past 10 years, RXL has outperformed UPW with an annualized return of 12.38%, while UPW has yielded a comparatively lower 9.52% annualized return.


RXL

1D
-0.81%
1M
12.62%
YTD
-5.21%
6M
-0.67%
1Y
23.20%
3Y*
5.75%
5Y*
2.74%
10Y*
12.38%

UPW

1D
-3.91%
1M
-5.56%
YTD
1.51%
6M
2.81%
1Y
12.18%
3Y*
15.76%
5Y*
9.14%
10Y*
9.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RXL vs. UPW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RXL
ProShares Ultra Health Care
-5.21%19.76%-2.72%-3.15%-15.26%48.06%19.24%40.40%3.38%46.92%
UPW
ProShares Ultra Utilities
1.51%23.61%37.67%-22.37%-4.59%32.57%-17.15%48.59%2.36%22.53%

Correlation

The correlation between RXL and UPW is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2007

0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between RXL and UPW has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RXL vs. UPW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RXL
UPW

Healthcare

78.0%

-

Financial Services

11.8%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

100.0%

Healthcare

RXL
78.0%
UPW

-

Financial Services

RXL
11.8%
UPW

-

Basic Materials

RXL

-

UPW

-

Communication Services

RXL

-

UPW

-

Consumer Cyclical

RXL

-

UPW

-

Consumer Defensive

RXL

-

UPW

-

Energy

RXL

-

UPW

-

Industrials

RXL

-

UPW

-

Real Estate

RXL

-

UPW

-

Technology

RXL

-

UPW

-

Utilities

RXL

-

UPW
100.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RXL vs. UPW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RXL
RXL Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
RXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
RXL Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
RXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
RXL Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

UPW
UPW Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
UPW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPW Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
UPW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPW Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RXL vs. UPW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) and ProShares Ultra Utilities (UPW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RXLUPWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.09

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

0.64

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.56

1.37

+1.19

RXL vs. UPW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RXL Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is higher than the UPW Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RXL and UPW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RXLUPWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

0.42

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.27

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.26

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.25

+0.16

Drawdowns

RXL vs. UPW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RXL drawdown since its inception was -67.70%, smaller than the maximum UPW drawdown of -77.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXL and UPW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RXLUPWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.70%

-77.75%

+10.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.33%

-19.15%

-2.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.08%

-33.16%

-2.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.08%

-49.42%

+13.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.00%

-62.67%

+11.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.85%

-17.67%

+3.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.85%

-22.59%

+6.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.10%

8.94%

+0.16%

Volatility

RXL vs. UPW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) is 10.35%, while ProShares Ultra Utilities (UPW) has a volatility of 11.60%. This indicates that RXL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UPW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RXLUPWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.35%

11.60%

-1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.49%

23.71%

-2.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.20%

29.25%

+0.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.74%

34.46%

-4.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.29%

37.20%

-3.91%

RXL vs. UPW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RXL and UPW have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

RXL vs. UPW - Dividend Comparison

RXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than UPW's 1.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RXL
ProShares Ultra Health Care
1.53%1.43%1.22%0.18%0.32%0.10%0.15%0.27%0.32%0.11%0.12%0.93%
UPW
ProShares Ultra Utilities
1.58%1.67%1.83%2.40%1.55%1.30%0.83%0.83%1.98%1.51%1.70%2.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


RXL and UPW have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UPW has higher volatility (11.60%) compared to RXL (10.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RXL dropped -67.70% vs UPW's -77.75%.

On 10-year performance, RXL leads with 12.38% vs 9.52% for UPW. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, RXL has been the lower-risk option at 10.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RXL has performed better with a 12.38% return vs 9.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RXL and UPW have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

UPW has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 1.53% for RXL.

RXL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index (200%), while UPW tracks Dow Jones U.S. Utilities Index (200%).

RXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RXL and UPW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer