RXL vs. QULL
RXL (ProShares Ultra Health Care) and QULL (ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - RXL tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index (200%) while QULL tracks the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RXL returned 2.43%/yr vs 14.76%/yr for QULL. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
RXL vs. QULL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RXL achieves a 4.11% return, which is significantly lower than QULL's 17.09% return.
RXL
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 14.82%
- 6M
- 3.71%
- YTD
- 4.11%
- 1Y
- 42.43%
- 3Y*
- 5.91%
- 5Y*
- 2.43%
- 10Y*
- 12.45%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.49%
QULL
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- 6M
- 16.44%
- YTD
- 17.09%
- 1Y
- 33.77%
- 3Y*
- 28.35%
- 5Y*
- 14.76%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.33%
RXL vs. QULL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RXL ProShares Ultra Health Care | 4.11% | 19.76% | -2.72% | -3.15% | -15.26% | 40.41% |
QULL ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN | 17.09% | 17.61% | 38.03% | 57.07% | -42.00% | 51.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between RXL and QULL is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RXL and QULL has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RXL vs. QULL — Risk / Return Rank
RXL
QULL
RXL vs. QULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RXL | QULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.24 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 1.84 | +0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.56 | 8.08 | -3.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RXL vs. QULL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RXL drawdown since its inception was -67.70%, which is greater than QULL's maximum drawdown of -51.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXL and QULL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RXL | QULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.70% | -51.83% | -15.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.33% | -18.43% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.08% | -36.82% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.08% | -51.83% | +15.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.43% | -2.08% | -3.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.80% | -13.76% | -2.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.32% | 4.19% | +5.13% |
Volatility
RXL vs. QULL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) has a higher volatility of 12.40% compared to ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) at 5.83%. This indicates that RXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RXL | QULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.40% | 5.83% | +6.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.85% | 19.60% | +4.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.94% | 24.80% | +7.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.19% | 35.64% | -5.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.42% | 34.89% | -1.47% |
RXL vs. QULL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both RXL and QULL have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
RXL vs. QULL - Dividend Comparison
RXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, while QULL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QULL ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RXL ProShares Ultra Health Care | 1.32% | 1.43% | 1.22% | 0.18% | 0.32% | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.27% | 0.32% | 0.11% | 0.12% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RXL and QULL have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RXL has higher volatility (12.40%) compared to QULL (5.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RXL dropped -67.70% vs QULL's -51.83%.
On 5-year performance, QULL leads with 14.76% vs 2.43% for RXL. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, QULL has been the lower-risk option at 5.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QULL has performed better with a 14.76% return vs 2.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RXL and QULL have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
RXL has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.00% for QULL.
RXL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index (200%), while QULL tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and UBS.
QULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RXL and QULL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer