PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
QULL vs. DUHP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QULL and DUHP is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.01.0

Performance

QULL vs. DUHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) and DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
4.64%
4.55%
QULL
DUHP

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QULL:

1.53

DUHP:

1.68

Sortino Ratio

QULL:

2.09

DUHP:

2.38

Omega Ratio

QULL:

1.27

DUHP:

1.31

Calmar Ratio

QULL:

2.47

DUHP:

2.58

Martin Ratio

QULL:

9.23

DUHP:

9.56

Ulcer Index

QULL:

4.25%

DUHP:

2.04%

Daily Std Dev

QULL:

25.72%

DUHP:

11.60%

Max Drawdown

QULL:

-51.83%

DUHP:

-20.05%

Current Drawdown

QULL:

-8.60%

DUHP:

-5.72%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QULL achieves a 38.91% return, which is significantly higher than DUHP's 18.65% return.


QULL

YTD

38.91%

1M

-1.51%

6M

3.78%

1Y

38.27%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

DUHP

YTD

18.65%

1M

-2.04%

6M

4.17%

1Y

18.90%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QULL vs. DUHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QULL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DUHP's 0.21% expense ratio.


QULL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN
Expense ratio chart for QULL: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%
Expense ratio chart for DUHP: current value at 0.21% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.21%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

QULL vs. DUHP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) and DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for QULL, currently valued at 1.53, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.531.68
The chart of Sortino ratio for QULL, currently valued at 2.09, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.002.092.38
The chart of Omega ratio for QULL, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.271.31
The chart of Calmar ratio for QULL, currently valued at 2.47, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.472.58
The chart of Martin ratio for QULL, currently valued at 9.23, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.009.239.56
QULL
DUHP

The current QULL Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the DUHP Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QULL and DUHP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.53
1.68
QULL
DUHP

Dividends

QULL vs. DUHP - Dividend Comparison

QULL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DUHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%.


TTM20232022
QULL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%
DUHP
DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF
0.84%1.51%1.10%

Drawdowns

QULL vs. DUHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QULL drawdown since its inception was -51.83%, which is greater than DUHP's maximum drawdown of -20.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QULL and DUHP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-8.60%
-5.72%
QULL
DUHP

Volatility

QULL vs. DUHP - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) has a higher volatility of 6.33% compared to DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) at 3.48%. This indicates that QULL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DUHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
6.33%
3.48%
QULL
DUHP
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab