QULL vs. DUHP

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) and DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP).

QULL and DUHP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QULL is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index. It was launched on Feb 5, 2021. DUHP is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Feb 23, 2022.

Performance

QULL vs. DUHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) and DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QULL vs. DUHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
QULL ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN	-6.95%	17.61%	38.03%	57.07%	-22.86%
DUHP DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF	-2.48%	13.77%	19.49%	21.11%	-2.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QULL achieves a -6.95% return, which is significantly lower than DUHP's -2.48% return.

QULL

• 1D: 1.22%
• 1M: -11.66%
• YTD: -6.95%
• 6M: -4.90%
• 1Y: 20.02%
• 3Y*: 26.76%
• 5Y*: 13.82%
• 10Y*: —

DUHP

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: -5.42%
• YTD: -2.48%
• 6M: -2.37%
• 1Y: 12.71%
• 3Y*: 15.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QULL vs. DUHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QULL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DUHP's 0.21% expense ratio.

QULL

ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN

DUHP

DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF

Return for Risk

QULL vs. DUHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QULL

QULL Risk / Return Rank: 33
QULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
QULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
QULL Omega Ratio Rank: 34
QULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
QULL Martin Ratio Rank: 38

DUHP

DUHP Risk / Return Rank: 41
DUHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
DUHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
DUHP Omega Ratio Rank: 40
DUHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
DUHP Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QULL vs. DUHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) and DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QULL	DUHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.54	0.75	-0.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.05	1.18	-0.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.17	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.82	1.06	-0.25
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.82	4.88	-1.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QULL vs. DUHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QULL Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is comparable to the DUHP Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QULL and DUHP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QULL	DUHP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54	0.75	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.71	-0.27

Correlation

The correlation between QULL and DUHP is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

QULL vs. DUHP - Dividend Comparison

QULL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DUHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
QULL ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DUHP DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF	1.09%	1.02%	1.13%	1.51%	1.10%

Drawdowns

QULL vs. DUHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QULL drawdown since its inception was -51.83%, which is greater than DUHP's maximum drawdown of -20.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QULL and DUHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	QULL	DUHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.83%	-20.05%	-31.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.81%	-12.07%	-12.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.83%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.36%	-6.04%	-6.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.46%	-4.16%	-10.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.32%	2.63%	+2.69%

Volatility

QULL vs. DUHP - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) has a higher volatility of 11.33% compared to DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) at 5.11%. This indicates that QULL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DUHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QULL	DUHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.33%	5.11%	+6.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.75%	8.73%	+11.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.54%	17.10%	+20.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.65%	16.42%	+19.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.49%	16.42%	+19.07%