PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWX vs. PDBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWX vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWX achieves a -3.84% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 23.47% return. Over the past 10 years, RWX has underperformed PDBC with an annualized return of 0.83%, while PDBC has yielded a comparatively higher 7.71% annualized return.


RWX

1D
-0.59%
1M
-2.41%
YTD
-3.84%
6M
-3.04%
1Y
2.91%
3Y*
6.53%
5Y*
-2.62%
10Y*
0.83%

PDBC

1D
-0.85%
1M
-10.11%
YTD
23.47%
6M
23.29%
1Y
22.26%
3Y*
10.44%
5Y*
10.25%
10Y*
7.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWX vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWX
SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF
-3.84%26.24%-12.15%6.25%-21.84%9.34%-9.03%19.88%-8.25%15.50%
PDBC
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
23.47%5.96%2.09%-6.25%19.23%41.72%-7.84%11.44%-12.78%5.06%

Correlation

The correlation between RWX and PDBC is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2014

0.23

The correlation between RWX and PDBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWX vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWX
RWX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
RWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
RWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

PDBC
PDBC Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
PDBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDBC Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
PDBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDBC Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWX vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RWXPDBCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.21

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.22

1.66

-1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.57

7.01

-6.44

RWX vs. PDBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWX Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the PDBC Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWX and PDBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RWX vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWX drawdown since its inception was -73.62%, which is greater than PDBC's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWX and PDBC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWXPDBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.62%

-49.52%

-24.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.58%

-13.48%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.05%

-13.95%

-5.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.91%

-27.63%

-8.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.37%

-40.73%

-2.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.20%

-13.48%

-1.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.28%

-23.15%

+2.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.11%

4.04%

+1.07%

Volatility

RWX vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX) is 4.01%, while Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) has a volatility of 4.38%. This indicates that RWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWXPDBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

4.38%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.26%

16.17%

-4.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.58%

18.73%

-5.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.85%

19.15%

-3.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.48%

17.78%

-1.30%

RWX vs. PDBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than PDBC's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

RWX vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison

RWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, more than PDBC's 3.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDBC
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
3.11%3.84%4.42%4.21%13.05%50.83%0.01%1.40%1.00%3.83%6.51%0.00%
RWX
SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF
5.09%3.65%4.32%3.90%4.05%4.62%2.92%8.94%5.28%2.77%8.74%2.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWX and PDBC have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDBC has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to RWX (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWX dropped -73.62% vs PDBC's -49.52%.

On 10-year performance, PDBC leads with 7.71% vs 0.83% for RWX. On fees, PDBC is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, RWX has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PDBC has performed better with a 7.71% return vs 0.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PDBC is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for RWX.

RWX has the higher dividend yield at 5.09%, compared with 3.11% for PDBC.

RWX is categorized as REIT, while PDBC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for RWX and 0.58% for PDBC.

PDBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWX and PDBC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer